Sunday, September 06, 2009

Listen to Real Logic

Watch this video in a new window

Congressman Mike Rogers' opening statement on Health Care reform in Washington D.C.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought and entertain, probably more so the writer rather than the reader. Nonetheless, opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French indeed suck.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Ideological Economics 101

SOCIALISM
You have 2 cows. You give one to your neighbor.

COMMUNISM
You have 2 cows. The State takes both and gives you some milk.

FASCISM
You have 2 cows. The State takes both and sells you some milk.

NAZISM
You have 2 cows. The State takes both and shoots you.

BUREAUCRATISM
You have 2 cows. The State takes both, shoots one, milks the other, and then throws the milk away…

TRADITIONAL CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You sell one and buy a bull. Your herd multiplies, and the economy grows. You sell them and retire on the income.

AMERICAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You sell one, and force the other to produce the milk of four cows. Later, you hire a consultant to analyze why the cow has dropped dead.

ENRON VENTURE CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You sell three of them to your publicly listed company, using letters of credit opened by your brother-in-law at the bank, then execute a debt/equity swap with an associated general offer so that you get all four cows back, with a tax exemption for five cows. The milk rights of the six cows are transferred via an intermediary to a Cayman Island Company secretly owned by the majority shareholder who sells the rights to all seven cows back to your listed company. The annual report says the company owns eight cows, with an option on one more. You sell one cow to buy a new president of the United States, leaving you with nine cows. No balance sheet provided with the release. The public then buys your bull.

THE ANDERSEN MODEL CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You shred them.

FRENCH CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You go on strike, organize a riot, and block the roads, because you want three cows.

JAPANESE CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You redesign them so they are one-tenth the size of an ordinary cow and produce twenty times the milk. You then create a clever cow cartoon image called ‘Cowkimon’ and market it worldwide.

GERMAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You re-engineer them so they live for 100 years, eat once a month, and milk themselves.

ITALIAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows, but you don’t know where they are. You decide to have Lunch.

RUSSIAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You count them and learn you have five cows. You count them again and learn you have 42 cows. You count them again and learn you have 2 cows. You stop counting cows and open another bottle of vodka.

SWISS CAPITALISM
You have 5000 cows. None of them belong to you. You charge the owners for storing them.

CHINESE CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You have 300 people milking them. You claim that you have full employment, and high bovine productivity. You arrest the newsman who reported the real situation.

INDIAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You worship them.

BRITISH CAPITALISM
You have two cows. Both are mad.

IRAQI CAPITALISM
Everyone thinks you have lots of cows. You tell them that you have none. No-one believes you, so they bomb the s**t out of you and invade your country. You still have no cows, but at least now you are part of a Democracy… .

ZIMBABWEAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows. MI6 arranges for a mob to shoot you and steal them for export to Britain.

WALL STREET CAPITALISM
You have two cows. You mortgage them to a broker who uses them as a mezzanine tranche in a collateralized debt obligation (CDO) sold to an investment bank that hypothecates them; they are then incorporated into a Credit Default Swap (CDS) and sold to a Japanese Bank which on swaps the CDS as an OTC derivative to a Swedish municipal authority. You keep the milk.

NEW ZEALAND CAPITALISM
You have two cows. The one on the left looks very attractive.

AUSTRALIAN CAPITALISM
You have two cows. Business seems pretty good. You close the office and go for a few beers to celebrate.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought and entertain, probably more so the writer rather than the reader. Nonetheless, opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French indeed suck.

Speaker Of Lies

By INVESTOR'S BUSINESS DAILY | Posted Friday, August 28, 2009 4:20 PM PT

Public Trust: What did the speaker know, and when did she know it? With CIA documents contradicting Nancy Pelosi's claims on classified briefings, will a death watch begin on her leadership?

Read More: Global War On Terror

The newly declassified CIA report on the interrogation of Islamist terrorists notes "in the fall of 2002, the agency briefed the leadership of the Congressional Intelligence Oversight Committees on the use of both standard techniques and EITs (enhanced interrogation techniques)."

The CIA, according to the report, "continued to brief the leadership of the Intelligence Oversight Committees on the use of EITs and detentions in February and March 2003."
And here's the zinger: "The general counsel says that none of the participants expressed any concern about the techniques or the program . . . ."

For months, Speaker Pelosi has claimed she and other high-ranking Democrats in Congress who were briefed by the CIA during President Bush's first term "were not told that waterboarding or any of these other enhanced interrogation techniques were used."

Others present with her at CIA intelligence briefings, like former House Intelligence Committee Chairman and CIA director Porter Goss, say otherwise.

Her credibility was also rattled by the revelation that Rep. Jane Harman, the California Democrat who succeeded Pelosi as ranking Democrat on the House intelligence panel, sent a classified letter to the CIA in February 2003 objecting to EITs.
Speaker Pelosi's behavior reeks of the kind of cynicism and hypocrisy Americans have become used to seeing in Washington.

Her liberal instincts were to object to the CIA's tough interrogation of terrorists.

But those briefings took place not long after the 9/11 attacks; the war in Afghanistan, home to al-Qaida and shelter for Osama bin Laden, was going well; and the Iraq War had not yet begun.

So there was no way for an ambitious politician like Pelosi to know which way the political winds would end up blowing.
At the time, President Bush was basking in popularity, and the nation was in lockstep behind his aggressive approach to waging the global war on terror — including in Iraq. For all Pelosi knew, it might stay that way for many years to come.
So she stayed quiet, keeping her options open. Now, with Democrats running the whole show in Washington and a Justice Department poised to criminalize CIA interrogators in a politicized national security witch hunt, she has chosen to revert to those liberal instincts.

That means condemning a successful strategy of harsh interrogation that gleaned valuable information from high-ranking al-Qaida detainees and foiled numerous terrorist attacks.

It also means turning hero interrogators, and the architects of the interrogation strategy, into scapegoats.

We have long warned that the revelations of this deceit, now fully confirmed by CIA documentation, mean there's a cancer growing on the speakership. The question now is how long it will take other Democratic leaders to get out of denial and do something about it.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought and entertain, probably more so the writer rather than the reader. Nonetheless, opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French indeed suck.

Saturday, August 29, 2009

I am thru with this family, finially.




Sadly our nation is morally bankrupt, we forget the grotesque things people do and allow the media and liberalism ideals amount to ‘heroism’ one celebrity after another, just because they are rich, or can shoot a ball thru a hoop

Until we start recognizing true heroes and ethical behavior as a nation, we are doomed to live in this mess we have allowed to continue unchecked by complacency.




*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought and entertain, probably more so the writer rather than the reader. Nonetheless, opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French indeed suck.

Thursday, August 20, 2009

easy target these frenchy folks




*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought and entertain, probably more so the writer rather than the reader. Nonetheless, opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French indeed suck.

Tuesday, August 18, 2009

Obama Special (6 videos)

To everyone who thought the special about Obama was going to be on Hannity. It was taken off. Here are the segments. You better watch now before they are removed too.

Yes, the program was not aired Sunday so it was googled and found the segments had been taken off of the internet as well. Wonder who did this?

Wonder who blocked this? Is this our NEW Government protecting us?


Here are the 6 segments if they haven't been removed before you get to them.

Part 1 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rthv8QmJLUw


Part 2 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kJNhKZh8mGY&feature=fvw


Part 3 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=95XFUi8PrTs&feature=related


Part 4 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gl4twMf1xyM&feature=related


Part 5 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CKzFtKEysjw&feature=related


Part 6 - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EmEmRbRJFLU&feature=related


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

The Skanko-HicoRat Queen Pelosi




Newt Gingrich, a Republican, served in the House from Georgia from 1978 and as House Minority Whip in 1989. He was Speaker of the House from 1995 to 1999. During that time he never made Use of military air craft.




The Queen

Nancy Pelosi, Democrat from California, current Speaker of the House. The Pentagon provides the House speaker with an Air Force plane large enough to accommodate her staff, family, supporters, and members of theCalifornia delegation when she travels around the country. But, Pelosi wanted routine access to a larger plane. It includes 42 business class seats, a fully-enclosed state room, an entertainment center, a private bed, state-of-the-art communications system, and a crew of 16. Pelosi wanted "carte blanche for an aircraft any time," including weekend trips home toSan Francisco. Pretty nice but very expensive perk! Her Air Force C-32 costs approximately $15,000 an hour or approximately $300,000 per triphome.

And she has the guts to confront the Big Three CEOs for flying their corporate jets to Washington ! YOU WOULD THINK SHE, ALONG WITH A HUSBAND WORTH AN ESTIMATED BILLION DOLLARS, WOULD LEASE OR BUY AND FLY THEIR OWN PLANE, OR FLY FIRST CLASS ON COMMERCIAL AIRLINES LIKE OTHER RICH PEOPLE.

NANCY PELOSI FACTS:

Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi's home district includes San Francisco . Star-Kist Tuna's headquarters are in San Francisco, Pelosi's home district. Star-Kist is owned by Del Monte Foods and is a major contributor to Pelosi. Star-Kist is the major employer in American Samoa employing 75% of the Samoan workforce.

Paul Pelosi, Nancy's husband, owns $17 million dollars of Star-Kist stock. In January, 2007 when the minimum wage was increased from $5.15 to $7.25, Pelosi had American Samoa exempted from the increase so Del Monte would not have to pay the higher wage. This would make Del Monte products less expensive than their competition's.

Recently, when the huge bailout bill was passed, Pelosi specifically added an earmark to the final bill adding $33 million dollars for an "economic development credit in American Samoa ."

And Pelosi has called the Bush Administration "CORRUPT!"

How do you spell "HYPOCRISY?"

EVERY AMERICAN SHOULD GET THIS E-MAIL. IT SHOULD BE ENOUGH TO MAKE ALL OF US ANGRY ENOUGH TO THROW THEM ALL OUT ON THEIR BEHINDS.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

UBS to reveal about 5,000 names in U.S. deal: source

REUTERS — By Tom Brown

MIAMI (Reuters) - UBS will give U.S. authorities the names of about 5,000 wealthy Americans suspected of using the Swiss bank to evade taxes under a deal that will be formalized this week, a U.S. legal source said on Monday.

The source, who asked not to be identified because he was not authorized to discuss the agreement, said it was due to be announced jointly by the Swiss and U.S. governments on Wednesday.

Initialed last week, the deal ends a long-running legal dispute between Swiss and U.S. negotiators over access to the names of American clients of UBS suspected of using secret accounts at the bank to conceal assets and dodge U.S. taxes.

The case strained relations between the United States and Switzerland because of aggressive tactics used by U.S. investigators for more than a year to crack open one of the world's leading bastions of bank secrecy and confidentiality.

The source said the deal settling the dispute, which was finally hammered out in Washington last week, would involve the disclosure to U.S. authorities of roughly 4,500 to 5,000 names of American clients of UBS.

That is less than the 52,000 names the United States originally hoped it could force the bank to disclose through a lawsuit.

But U.S. government sources have said repeatedly that U.S. prosecutors could still claim a big win in the case, if they come away with names believed to hold the biggest offshore accounts, containing the bulk of the estimated $15 billion in assets linked to U.S.-based clients of UBS.

That, in turn, should resonate across the global offshore banking industry amid concerted efforts by the United States and other countries to fight money-laundering and tax cheats.

UBS became the target of U.S. probes in 2007 when a former executive at the bank, Bradley Birkenfeld, began cooperating with U.S. authorities and helped them start building criminal and civil complaints against the bank.

The whistle-blower, who once smuggled a client's diamonds into the United States in a toothpaste tube, is due to be sentenced in a Florida court on Friday after pleading guilty in June 2008 to helping a billionaire hide $200 million of assets from U.S. authorities.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

Lou Pritchett is one of corporate America 's true living legends- an acclaimed author, dynamic teacher and one of the world's highest rated speakers. Successful corporate executives everywhere recognize him as the foremost leader in change management. Lou changed the way America does business by creating an audacious concept that came to be known as "partnering." Pritchett rose from soap salesman to Vice-President, Sales and Customer Development for Procter and Gamble and over the course of 36 years, made corporate history.


AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA

Dear President Obama:

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.
You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don't understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', always blaming others. You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America ' crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O'Relllys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points & views.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

Lou Pritchett

TRUE - CHECK: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/youscareme.asp

This letter was sent to the NY Times but they never acknowledged it.

Big surprise. Since it hit the internet, however, it has had over 500,000 hits. Keep it going. All that is necessary for evil to succeed is that good men do nothing.

It's happening right now.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, August 17, 2009

Top 10……Poverty in Our Major Cities

I think this explains a lot of our problems but most already knew it.

Top 10……Poverty in Our Major Cities


City, State, % of People Below the Poverty Level

1. Detroit , MI

32.5%

2. Buffalo , NY

29.9%

3. Cincinnati , OH

27.8%

4. Cleveland , OH

27.0%

5. Miami , FL

26.9%

5. St. Louis , MO

26.8%

7. El Paso , TX

26.4%

8. Milwaukee , WI

26.2%

9. Philadelphia , PA

25.1%

10. Newark , NJ

24.2%

U.S. Census Bureau, 2006 American Community Survey, August 2007


What do the top ten cities (over 250,000) with the highest poverty rate all have in common?

Detroit, MI (1st on the poverty rate list) hasn't elected a Republican mayor since 1961;


Buffalo, NY (2nd) hasn't elected one since 1954;

Cincinnati , OH (3rd)...since 1984;

Cleveland , OH (4th)...since 1989;

Miami , FL (5th) has never had a Republican mayor;

St. Louis , MO (6th)....since 1949;

El Paso , TX (7th) has never had a Republican mayor;

Milwaukee , WI (8th)...since 1908;

Philadelphia , PA (9th)...since 1952;

Newark , NJ (10th)...since 1907.

Einstein once said, 'The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.'

It is the
poor who habitually elect Democrats---yet they are still .....................

POOR


"You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich. You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong. You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift. You cannot lift the wage earner up by pulling the wage payer down. You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred. You cannot build character and courage by taking away people's initiative and independence. You cannot help people permanently by doing for them, what they could and should do for themselves."

Abraham Lincoln


.............................and you, Mr. Obama, are no Abe Lincoln




*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Saturday, August 15, 2009

ACLU Supports Jailed Deadbeat Dads... "Their kids are shitbags and the Slut Single-Mom's are Whores!"

In an effort to remove food from the mouths of babes and make it even harder for single mothers, the ACLU threatens expensive litigation and petitions to release the misunderstood dead-beat dads.

These men need to have some pocket change for an occasional beer and lap dances at the strip bar. Additionally, these dads are potential child molesters and can further promote the child porn industry if we can keep them out of jail and on the Internet.

"These slut moms will just waste the child support payments on eggs, cheese, milk, school supplies, and utilities. None of these consumable dollars goes to the ACLU or child porn." "That is simply not acceptable, it is a no-brainer to help the dead-beat dads get out of jail."

The dads are so grateful, they actually become card-carrying members of the ACLU. We provide along with the membership to the infamous ACLU, 3-months free child porn access, an information packet from NAMBLA and various communist and anti-Christian literature.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, August 13, 2009

About Fucking Time!

UBS, U.S. settle tax evasion case

REUTERS — 2:38 PM ET 08/12/09

By Pascal Fletcher and Lisa Jucca

MIAMI/ZURICH (Reuters) - The days of secret bank accounts are numbered for Americans after UBS and the U.S. and Swiss governments agreed to settle a dispute over whether the Swiss bank should be forced to disclose the names of 52,000 rich U.S. clients suspected of tax evasion.

Lawyers involved in the case said Wednesday's settlement could involve the disclosure to U.S. authorities of 3,000 to perhaps more than 10,000 names of American clients suspected of using offshore accounts to evade taxes.

While details weren't disclosed, the parties have initialed agreements that will "take a little time to be signed in final form," Department of Justice lawyer Stuart Gibson told U.S. District Court Judge Alan Gold during a brief conference call.

The case is expected to be dismissed once a final agreement is in place. UBS and the government had reached a settlement in principle on July 31.

The deal is also expected to put European tax dodgers on notice as other governments are encouraged to seek out hidden accounts.

U.S. authorities believe the 52,000 U.S.-based clients of UBS may be hiding nearly $15 billion of assets.

Washington's case against UBS, the world's second-largest wealth manager, had strained relations between the United States and Switzerland because it challenged the latter's jealously guarded bank secrecy laws.

UBS shares closed 3 percent higher in Switzerland and were up more than four percent in afternoon trading in New York.

"This is definitely good news for UBS," said Milan Patel, a tax lawyer at Withers LLP in Geneva.

"However, this may mean that UBS could face a new legal battle in Switzerland if the account holders claim UBS violated Swiss bank secrecy laws by disclosing their names," Patel added. "Thus, UBS may have ended the U.S. legal battle only to start the Swiss legal battle."

OVERHANG LIFTED

In February, UBS agreed to pay $780 million to settle criminal charges in a similar dispute with the U.S. government. The bank agreed to hand over data on about 250 U.S. clients, and promised to close its offshore business to U.S. clients.

UBS Chairman Kaspar Villiger said the bank was "grateful" that the two governments had resolved their differences in the latest case. The bank said it expected a final agreement "in the near future."

Doug Shulman, commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, the U.S. tax collection agency, said the pact with Switzerland "protects the United States government's interests."

Both governments must now sign off on the settlement, the Swiss Justice Ministry said.

A settlement would eliminate one overhang for UBS, whose losses on toxic debt led to a 6 billion Swiss franc ($6.45 billion) injection from the Swiss government last year.

The Swiss government has said it would like to sell its 9 percent stake in the bank soon.

U.S. authorities had sought the names of UBS clients they believed had either inherited substantial wealth and have European roots, are frequent business travelers who receive offshore compensation via Swiss accounts, or intended their accounts from the start as a means to avoid U.S. taxes.

But UBS, backed by the Swiss government, held onto the names, calling the U.S. demand a fishing expedition that would breach bilateral tax agreements and Swiss bank secrecy laws, which have been eroding in recent years.

"It is not possible to say just how well the Swiss did in resisting full compliance," said Robert Katzberg, a New York white-collar criminal lawyer at Kaplan & Katzberg who represents some U.S. taxpayers in the UBS matter.

He said he expected the United States to "receive much of what it has been seeking."

Many other banks have also started to shut down secret accounts of U.S. clients, and lawyers believe their efforts may soon extend to other countries' citizens as well.

"For U.S. taxpayers it is going to be impossible to hide money in Switzerland, and it is just a matter of time that this is the case also for Germans and Britons," said Asher Rubinstein, a partner at Rubinstein & Rubinstein LLP in New York. "Switzerland will no longer be a tax haven."

OTHERS MAY SEEK AMNESTY

Alfred Mettler, a Georgia State University finance professor and member of a Swiss task force on bank secrecy, said it would likely take months to implement the UBS pact, and may foreshadow an IRS push to ferret out suspected tax cheats.

"The IRS will certainly increase its efforts to go after non-taxed money wherever it is," he said. "But you need some evidence, and my guess is other banks, not only Swiss banks, must have taken steps to be proactive."

Details of the UBS agreement may affect the pace of activity under an IRS amnesty program that lets Americans reveal secret Swiss bank accounts in exchange for lower penalties. That program ends on September 23.

"The store is still open for voluntary disclosure," said William Sharp, a principal at Sharp Kemm PA in Tampa, Florida who represents some UBS clients.

UBS shares rose 3.1 percent to 16.34 Swiss francs in Switzerland. In the United States, they were up 4 percent at $15.30 in afternoon trading on the New York Stock Exchange.

The case is U.S. v. UBS AG, U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida (Miami), No. 09-20423. (Additional reporting by Jim Loney and Jane Sutton in Miami; Juan Lagorio and Jonathan Stempel in New York; and Sven Egenter, Rupert Pretterklieber and Katie Reid in Zurich; Writing by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Ted Kerr)



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

I thought it was a criminal offense to "cook the books." So these assholes that used to run AIG are running around free because why?

Ex-AIG CEO, others to pay $115 million to settle lawsuit: source

REUTERS — 6:35 PM ET 08/12/09

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Former AIG chief executive, Maurice "Hank" Greenberg, and five other defendants, have agreed to pay $115 million to settle a shareholder lawsuit, according to a person familiar with the matter.

The cost of the settlement is expected to be largely recouped through an insurance policy that covers company directors and officers against the cost of lawsuits, according to the person.

The development comes days after Greenberg and former AIG chief financial officer Howard Smith reached an agreement to settle accusations by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission that they had altered AIG's financial records from 2000 to 2005 to inflate the insurer's earnings.

Smith would also be covered by the settlement, as would former AIG reinsurance executive Christian Milton, former AIG controller Michael Castelli and two companies controlled by Greenberg, C.V. Starr & Co and Starr International Co, said the person who was not authorized to speak publicly on the matter.

The settlement is contingent on the lawsuit getting class action status, which a New York judge could make a decision on this week.

The lawsuit was brought by several Ohio pension funds in 2004, claiming the funds lost money on their investment in AIG because of misaccounting and fraudulent practices related to brokerage compensation by AIG from 1999 to 2004, and includes AIG's restatement of its financial results in 2005.

Several other defendants have already settled the same lawsuit, including Berkshire Hathaway's (Symbol : BRK/A) General Re Corp, which had entered into a reinsurance transaction with AIG that improperly boosted its loss reserves, and AIG's auditor PricewaterhouseCoopers.

But some other defendants have not reached agreements with the Ohio pension funds, including American International Group Inc, which had to take a $180 billion federal rescue package to keep from collapsing under derivatives losses last year.

Greenberg, who built AIG into the world's largest insurer over 38 years as CEO, was forced to resign in 2005 because he refused to cooperate with an internal investigation into the insurer's accounting practices, which were unrelated to the company's current financial woes.

If the settlement is finalized it will be one more issue related to AIG that Greenberg, 84, can put behind him.

Greenberg, Smith and corporate entities associated with them have been embroiled for more than four years in lawsuits brought by AIG, its shareholders, or regulators.

Apart from the recent settlement of SEC charges, a jury last month found that Greenberg-controlled Starr International had not improperly raided a block of AIG shares that were once used to fund long-term compensation for AIG executives. U.S. district judge Jed Rakoff is expected to reach a final decision on that matter this month.




*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, August 12, 2009

You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity

... You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. The government cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that they do not have to work because the other half is going to take care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work for, that my dear friend, is the beginning of the end of any nation. You cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."*

* Adrian Rogers, 1931*



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, August 11, 2009

Sweet Mother of Pork!

Yummies from a co-worker, much thanks. Bacon and Salt, per genius, and may lead to something truly tasty. I am going to try the Hickory Bacon Salt on trout, the Peppered we already had on fried cabbage and onions, the Cheddar went on some scrambled eggs for the youngins.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, August 05, 2009

Cruel and Usual Punishment

Joys of A Muslim Women - by Nonie Darwish

In the Muslim faith a Muslim man can marry a child as young as 1 year old and have sexual intimacy with this child. Consummating the marriage by 9.


The dowry is given to the family in exchange for the woman (who becomes his slave) and for the purchase of the private parts of the woman, to use her as a toy.


Even though a woman is abused she cannot obtain a divorce. To prove rape, the woman must have (4) male witnesses. Often after a woman has been raped, she is returned to her family and the family must return the dowry. The family has the right to execute her (an honor killing) to restore the honor of the family. Husbands can beat their wives 'at will' and he does not have to say why he has beaten her.


The husband is permitted to have (4 wives) and a temporary wife for an hour (prostitute) at his discretion.


The Shariah Muslim law controls the private as well as the public life of the woman.


In the West World (America) Muslim men are starting to demand Shariah Law so the wife cannot obtain a divorce and he can have full and complete control of her. It is amazing and alarming how many of our sisters and daughters attending American Universities are now marrying Muslim men and submitting themselves and their children unsuspectingly to the Shariah law.


By passing this on, enlightened American women may avoid becoming a slave under Shariah Law.


Learn More... Read: “Cruel and Usual Punishment” just released in most bookstores.


Author and lecturer Nonie Darwish says the goal of radical Islamists is to impose Shariah law on the world, ripping Western law and liberty in two.


She recently authored the book, Cruel and Usual Punishment: The Terrifying Global Implications of Islamic Law.


Darwish was born in Cairo and spent her childhood in Egypt and Gaza before immigrating to America in 1978, when she was eight years old, her father died while leading covert attacks on Israel. He was a high- ranking Egyptian military officer stationed with his family in Gaza.


When he died, he was considered a "shahid," a martyr for jihad. His posthumous status earned Nonie and her family an elevated position In Muslim society.


But Darwish developed a skeptical eye at an early age. She questioned her own Muslim culture and upbringing. She converted to Christianity after hearing a Christian preacher on television.


In her latest book, Darwish warns about creeping sharia law - what it is, what it means, and how it is manifested in Islamic countries.


For the West, she says radical Islamists are working to impose sharia on the world. If that happens, Western civilization will be destroyed.


In twenty years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President! I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this, but with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized, unless each of us sends it on!


This is your chance to make a difference............... Nonie Darwish


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Feed? you say... Just like in Solient Green, cool!

In an effort to feed the millions of illegals, the "Obama Citizens"; there is a renewed effort to continue the wholesale slaughter of innocent viable babies with a new purpose. Since just exterminating babies for extra income, pleasure, and birth control for liberals isn't completely acceptable thru-out the Christian groups yet, the Democrats are floating a new outlook on necessary abortion for a good cause....

Feed? you say... Just like in Solient Green ? There is an effort to turn the millions of unwanted babies into tasty crackers and snacks for the illegals new entitlement... "Can't send an llegal to free college without some yummies in his/her belly". This is a win-win, I get to slaughter thousands of babies every day and establish "new" jobs in the tasty partial-birth cracker industry. These Natural foods are ike fruits, vegetables, and vegan-meat."

if Measure 11 passes - Freedom Of Choice Act (FOCA) - - - Barack Obama is without question, the most aggressively pro-abortion president in the history of our nation, and tragically, we now also have the most pro-abortion Congress.

We have not been able to reverse Roe vs. Wade for the simple reason that the Supreme Court has not had a pro-life majority to do so. During these years, however, we have progressively been passing laws that little by little have been protecting unborn babies and their mothers from abortion. They are responsible for greatly reducing the number of annual abortions from a peak of 1,600,000 in the 1980s to about 1,200,000 today. This decrease has occurred because of the protective laws below. Some of those that would be cancelled if FOCA is passed intact include:
  • Partial birth abortion bans
  • The Hyde Amendment (restricting taxpayer funding of abortions)
  • Women’s right to know (informed consent) laws
  • Waiting periods
  • Parental consent and notification laws
  • Bans on abortion after viability (when a child can survive outside the womb)
  • State and federal conscience clauses for individual and institutional healthcare providers who decline to participate in abortion
*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

I am finally onboard the Obama/Pelosi Socialist Plan.

1. Allow all illegal aliens absolute citizen rights and remove all obstacles of entering into the country.

2. Provide all illegal, non-naturalized, and non-American “Obama Citizens” free entitlements, housing, and health care at taxpayer expense.

3. Provide the new “Obama Citizens” with free college education, not slumpy state schools, Ivy League schools like Barry “Ivan” Obama got. Actually, maybe the same Muslims that paid for Barry’s education could help pay for these illegals, but preferably we would provide these “Obama Citizens” Graduate and Postgraduate education at the taxpayer’s expense.

4. After the “Obama Citizens” have an excellent education at taxpayers’ expense, provide free first class travel back to their homeland or any communist or Muslim nation they wish to reside.

5. Each “Obama Citizens” would also need at taxpayer expense, a little nest egg, say $500k to start up a new business, or to use towards promoting Anti-American… I mean Liberal Pelosi ideals.

6. Once these “Obama Citizens” are well established, say 200 years of progress we will see some good results i.e.:

  • No need for the drug war spending since illegals will have a solid future on the backs of the American taxpayer
  • No need for homeland security spending, there will be nothing worth to protect, no borders to protect.
  • No need for DoD spending, we will be the pussy's of the earth and nobody will stoop to picking on such a pathetic nation. Besides, we would have absorbed and incorporated about every Un-American ideal possible and there would be no furhter need to transform our New Republic.
  • No need for the constant struggle of the Christian faith, it will be eliminated by the new Republic, and Christians will be just a rumor or urban legend.
  • We would all be able to speak Spanish and Ebonics’-French; otherwise we would not be able to communicate with our Oppressors.
  • … There are countless other benefits to this plan, I am just too excited to put them to ink.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Nanny Pelosi's Flowers - David Drake article


"Let there be flowers!"

The Hill reports that Nanny Pelosi is putting taxpayer money to good use by spending over $16 thousand dollars on flowers:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has spent $16,000 on flowers since taking office, one reason why she spent 63 percent more in her high-profile inaugural year than her low-key predecessor did last year.

Pelosi (D-Calif.) spent a little more than $3 million in the first nine months of 2007, records show, compared to the $1.8 million Rep. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) spent during the same period in 2006.

Republicans say Pelosi’s office spending undercuts her message that Democrats are restoring fiscal responsibility to the halls of Congress.

“They could have saved the taxpayer $16,000 by sending out an intern to pick flowers from the Capitol lawn, but I guess that would have detracted from the $4 million worth of pork they planted as part of the ‘greening’ project,” said Brian Kennedy, spokesman for [House Minority Leader John] Boehner [(R-Ohio)].

Most of the $16,058 that Pelosi charged taxpayers for flowers, Elshami said, was for the visits of foreign dignitaries, such as Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert, French President Nicolas Sarkozy and Jordan’s King Abdullah.

While Hastert didn’t appear to spend any money on flowers last year, bouquets are not new to Pelosi’s office. She spent about $5,000 on flowers last year when she was minority leader.

Another factor in the disparity is travel. Hastert didn’t bill much official travel last year, spending only about $1,700, while Pelosi racked up many times that at nearly $60,000 — a figure that does not include her “congressional delegation” journeys to Europe and the Middle East. It does, however, include many visits to congressional districts.

Other expenses in Pelosi’s office include:

A $10,000 contract to former Clinton White House speechwriter Heather Hurlburt to write the speech Pelosi delivered to the Israeli Knesset.

Nearly $20,000 to Washington attorney Richard Meltzer to help with Pelosi’s transition. “Just like a presidential transition, Richard Meltzer was hired to oversee the historic changeover of Congress,” Elshami said.

More than $2,400 to hire a makeup artist for the week of her swearing in. Pelosi later reimbursed the entire cost from her personal funds.

Money is distributed evenly between the Republicans and Democrats for those functions, and the party leaders decide how to allocate them.

Under that calculation, Republicans spent 18 percent less than they did last year while Democrats’ spending rose 4 percent over last year. Democrats, however, say that is not a legitimate comparison.

Boehner is exactly right.

$2,400 for a make-up artist, and Nanny STILL looks like the south end of a northbound horse? What a waste of money that was.

And as far as the Dems claiming that the comparison of the Republicans spending less than the Dems - of course the Dems are going to cry their usual whine of "it's not [a] faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaair comparison." Nothing is ever fair in the minds of LiberTards.

Now we know why Nanny did nothing to address the recent House Page Sex Scandal. And why she didn't have time to meet with General David Petraeus. She was too busy - in between botox injections and dermabrasion appointments - spending taxpayer money on flowers. And finding a make-up artist to paint her face and fill in the cracks with spackle...Pelosi Brand Spackle, no doubt.

If she were a REAL Liberal and Progressive - if she were a REAL believer in Mother Earth - she would buy plastic flowers instead of killing defenseless real flowers.

I'm certain that Olmert, Sarkozy and King Abdullah still speak of the wonderful floral arrangement that Peloshit organized for them.

The Dems, Libs and Progs sure can spend the taxpayer money, can't they?

Maybe it will take a woman to "clean up the House." But clearly, Peloshit is not that woman.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

From Canada Free Press.com

MICHELLE PERSONAL STAFF....
  1. $172,2000 - Sher, Susan (CHIEF OF STAFF)
  2. $140,000 - Frye, Jocelyn C. (DEPUTY ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF POLICY AND PROJECTS FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  3. $113,000 - Rogers, Desiree G. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND WHITE HOUSE SOCIAL SECRETARY)
  4. $102,000 - Johnston, Camille Y. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTOR OF COMMUNICATIONS FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  5. Winter, Melissa E. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT TO THE PRESIDENT AND DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE FIRST LADY)
  6. $90,000 - Medina, David S. (DEPUTY CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE FIRST LADY)
  7. $84,000 - Lelyveld, Catherine M. (DIRECTOR AND PRESS SECRETARY TO THE FIRST LADY)
  8. $75,000 - Starkey, Frances M. (DIRECTOR OF SCHEDULING AND ADVANCE FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  9. $70,000 - Sanders, Trooper (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF POLICY AND PROJECTS FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  10. $65,000 - Burnough, Erinn J. (DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY SOCIAL SECRETARY)
  11. Reinstein, Joseph B. (DEPUTY DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY SOCIAL SECRETARY)
  12. $62,000 - Goodman, Jennifer R. (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF SCHEDULING AND EVENTS COORDINATOR FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  13. $60,000 - Fitts, Alan O. (DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF ADVANCE AND TRIP DIRECTOR FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  14. Lewis, Dana M. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT AND PERSONAL AIDE TO THE FIRST LADY)
  15. $52,500 - Mustaphi, Semonti M. (ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR AND DEPUTY PRESS SECRETARY TO THE FIRST LADY)
  16. $50,000 - Jarvis, Kristen E. (SPECIAL ASSISTANT FOR SCHEDULING AND TRAVELING AIDE TO THE FIRST LADY)
  17. $45,000 - Lechtenberg, Tyler A. (ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF CORRESPONDENCE FOR THE FIRST LADY)
  18. Tubman, Samantha (DEPUTY ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR,SOCIAL OFFICE)
  19. $40,000 - Boswell, Joseph J. (EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT TO THE CHIEF OF STAFF TO THE FIRST LADY)
  20. $36,000 - Armbruster, Sally M. (STAFF ASSISTANT TO THE SOCIAL SECRETARY)
  21. Bookey, Natalie (STAFF ASSISTANT)
  22. Jackson, Deilia A. (DEPUTY ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF CORRESPONDENCE FOR THE FIRST LADY)

READER FEEDBACK...
.

This is OBAMANABLY!!!! I've been laid off....wonder if she will hire me?
Posted by Lanette Langley on 08/04 at 08:18 PM | #



do michelle and obama think they are royalty? they are just plain people. this is the most ridiculous thing I ever heard of. she should pay for these services herself if she needs them.
Posted by estalene on 08/04 at 07:39 PM | #



It is rather disheartening to know how much is being spent by the First Lady, and I would certainly appreciate the same information regarding First Ladies Bush and Clinton for comparison. Did their beauticians travel with them? This information has not been publicized in the U.S. that I know about. Thanks for the information. Diane
Posted by Diane Tate on 08/04 at 07:23 PM | #



Nice to see the race history of the people. I she an equal opportunity employeer??
Posted by russ hanson on 08/04 at 07:22 PM | #



Posted by Sharon: "...both Michelle and Barack need to be watched very closely. There's an agenda here that I think is just starting to become apparent. Why do you think they locked up his Harvard papers and her thesis at Princeton?"

Agree. AND, why do you suppose Michelle is barred from practicing law in Illinois???
What's that all about???
Posted by KBB on 08/04 at 07:11 PM | #



Remember she is the one that stated that several of 'Her people' we slaves at one time.

Latest research on that one lead one to believe that she must have been smoking pot and doing crack with Obama.

Not sure if it is still on Line.. but her Princeton Thesis.. was geared up to see WHY SUCCESSFUL Blacks did not give back to the Community.

She was not a happy camper at Princeton... BECAUSE SHE WAS NOT AS SMART as non-whites.

Appears to be a product of AFFIRMATIVE action at Princeton and HARVARD.

Also note that she gave up her law license ONE STEP aheard of the Ethics Board in Chicago for INSURANCE FRAUD.

Member of the Daly Political Staff in Chicago... so well connected in Chicago politics. Another BLACK FEMALE HARVARD lawyer.. that obviously was not SMART enough to make the GRADE.
Posted by Bob Miller on 08/04 at 06:23 PM | #


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

We are proving this now.


Click on image to enlarge.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Sunday, July 05, 2009

Finially! I found something the French have done besides retreat and perfect arrogance.

July 5: General Interest
1946 : Bikini introduced

On July 5, 1946, French designer Louis Reard unveils a daring two-piece swimsuit at the Piscine Molitor, a popular swimming pool in Paris. Parisian showgirl Micheline Bernardini modeled the new fashion, which Reard dubbed "bikini," inspired by a news-making U.S. atomic test that took place off the Bikini Atoll in the Pacific Ocean earlier that week.

European women first began wearing two-piece bathing suits that consisted of a halter top and shorts in the 1930s, but only a sliver of the midriff was revealed and the navel was vigilantly covered. In the United States, the modest two-piece made its appearance during World War II, when wartime rationing of fabric saw the removal of the skirt panel and other superfluous material. Meanwhile, in Europe, fortified coastlines and Allied invasions curtailed beach life during the war, and swimsuit development, like everything else non-military, came to a standstill.

In 1946, Western Europeans joyously greeted the first war-free summer in years, and French designers came up with fashions to match the liberated mood of the people. Two French designers, Jacques Heim and Louis Reard, developed competing prototypes of the bikini. Heim called his the "atom" and advertised it as "the world's smallest bathing suit." Reard's swimsuit, which was basically a bra top and two inverted triangles of cloth connected by string, was in fact significantly smaller. Made out of a scant 30 inches of fabric, Reard promoted his creation as "smaller than the world's smallest bathing suit." Reard called his creation the bikini, named after the Bikini Atoll.

In planning the debut of his new swimsuit, Reard had trouble finding a professional model who would deign to wear the scandalously skimpy two-piece. So he turned to Micheline Bernardini, an exotic dancer at the Casino de Paris, who had no qualms about appearing nearly nude in public. As an allusion to the headlines that he knew his swimsuit would generate, he printed newspaper type across the suit that Bernardini modeled on July 5 at the Piscine Molitor. The bikini was a hit, especially among men, and Bernardini received some 50,000 fan letters.

Before long, bold young women in bikinis were causing a sensation along the Mediterranean coast. Spain and Italy passed measures prohibiting bikinis on public beaches but later capitulated to the changing times when the swimsuit grew into a mainstay of European beaches in the 1950s. Reard's business soared, and in advertisements he kept the bikini mystique alive by declaring that a two-piece suit wasn't a genuine bikini "unless it could be pulled through a wedding ring."

In prudish America, the bikini was successfully resisted until the early 1960s, when a new emphasis on youthful liberation brought the swimsuit en masse to U.S. beaches. It was immortalized by the pop singer Brian Hyland, who sang "Itsy Bitsy Teenie Weenie Yellow Polka-Dot Bikini" in 1960, by the teenage "beach blanket" movies of Annette Funicello and Frankie Avalon, and by the California surfing culture celebrated by rock groups like the Beach Boys. Since then, the popularity of the bikini has only continued to grow.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, June 16, 2009

AN OPEN LETTER TO PRESIDENT OBAMA


By Lou Pritchett

Dear President Obama:

You are the thirteenth President under whom I have lived and unlike any of the others, you truly scare me.

You scare me because after months of exposure, I know nothing about you.

You scare me because I do not know how you paid for your expensive Ivy League education and your upscale lifestyle and housing with no visible signs of support.

You scare me because you did not spend the formative years of youth growing up in America and culturally you are not an American.

You scare me because you have never run a company or met a payroll.

You scare me because you have never had military experience, thus don't understand it at its core.

You scare me because you lack humility and 'class', always blaming others.

You scare me because for over half your life you have aligned yourself with radical extremists who hate America and you refuse to publicly denounce these radicals who wish to see America fail.

You scare me because you are a cheerleader for the 'blame America' crowd and deliver this message abroad.

You scare me because you want to change America to a European style country where the government sector dominates instead of the private sector.

You scare me because you want to replace our health care system with a government controlled one.

You scare me because you prefer 'wind mills' to responsibly capitalizing on our own vast oil, coal and shale reserves.

You scare me because you want to kill the American capitalist goose that lays the golden egg which provides the highest standard of living in the world.

You scare me because you have begun to use 'extortion' tactics against certain banks and corporations.

You scare me because your own political party shrinks from challenging you on your wild and irresponsible spending proposals.

You scare me because you will not openly listen to or even consider opposing points of view from intelligent people.

You scare me because you falsely believe that you are both omnipotent and omniscient.

You scare me because the media gives you a free pass on everything you do.

You scare me because you demonize and want to silence the Limbaughs, Hannitys, O'Relllys and Becks who offer opposing, conservative points of view.

You scare me because you prefer controlling over governing.

Finally, you scare me because if you serve a second term I will probably not feel safe in writing a similar letter in 8 years.

Lou Pritchett


Note: Lou Pritchett is a former vice president of Procter & Gamble whose career at that company spanned 36 years before his retirement in 1989, and he is the author of the 1995 business book, Stop Paddling & Start Rocking the Boat.

Mr. Pritchett confirmed that he was indeed the author of the much-circulated "open letter." “I did write the 'you scare me' letter. I sent it to the NY Times but they never acknowledged or published it. However, it hit the internet and according to the ‘experts’ has had over 500,000 hits.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, June 09, 2009

Bacon is for Patriots


Pedophile Shit heads, NAMBLA Shit heads, the ACLU losers who encourage, support, represent and fight for the Pedophiles & NAMBLA lowlifes, and Terrorist -- don't like Patriotic Bacon.

Meet "Sid and Nanci," who are two very prominent ACLU lawyers... they get paid representing child rapist and terrorizing Christians. Sid and Nanci are the pride & joy of the ACLU and have been seen hanging with Jane Fonda and other Hollywood elitist in California where they are barely recognizable from other Californians.







They have just served up this yummy ACLU favorite; this ACLU staple is so popular, it has become the image of what the ACLU has done for the U.S. and decent Americans.
















*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Foreigners are like billiards?


HINT: Foreigners are like billiards, the harder you hit them the better their English.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, June 08, 2009

Oh wait Obama has a plan...

What 3.6 Million Jobs Lost Over 13 Months Looks Like

This chart compares the job loss so far in this recession to job losses in the 1990-1991 recession and the 2001 recession – showing how dramatic and unprecedented the job loss over the last 13 months has been. Over the last 13 months, our economy has lost a total of 3.6 million jobs – and continuing job losses in the next few months are predicted.

By comparison, we lost a total of 1.6 million jobs in the 1990-1991 recession, before the economy began turning around and jobs began increasing; and we lost a total of 2.7 million jobs in the 2001 recession, before the economy began turning around and jobs began increasing.

Jobs lost chart

Oh wait Obama has a plan... his administration expects to save or create 600,000 more jobs this summer, as the federal government spends dozens of billions to expand care at health centers, spruce up national parks, hire teachers and improve military facilities.

That is 0.1666 or 17%, WOW that is awesome. Obama has spent more than both Gulf Wars in Iraq plus the Katrina effort combined in the Recovery Act to restore less than 20% with temporary jobs... these are not even permanent positions.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, June 01, 2009

Gravely Wicked [Robert P. George]

Gravely Wicked [Robert P. George] -- I AGREE WITH R.P. GEORGE; TILLER WAS ACQUITTED, TECHNICALLY AN INNOCENT MAN IN THE EYES OF THE LAW. FREAKISH AND IRONIC -- THAT AFTER THE THOUSANDS OF BABIES TILLER SLAUGHTERED ONE SLIPPED THRU WHO HAPPENED TO OWN A GUN. THIS DEATH, ALTHOUGH MAY HAVE SAVED LIVES IN THE EYES OF SOME, DONE NOTHING TO HELP A CAUSE I BELIEVE WORTHWHILE. WHEN ARE WE EVER GOING TO LEARN?

Whoever murdered George Tiller has done a gravely wicked thing. The evil of this action is in no way diminished by the blood George Tiller had on his own hands. No private individual had the right to execute judgment against him. We are a nation of laws. Lawless violence breeds only more lawless violence. Rightly or wrongly, George Tilller was acquitted by a jury of his peers. "Vengeance is mine, says the Lord." For the sake of justice and right, the perpetrator of this evil deed must be prosecuted, convicted, and punished. By word and deed, let us teach that violence against abortionists is not the answer to the violence of abortion. Every human life is precious. George Tiller's life was precious. We do not teach the wrongness of taking human life by wrongfully taking a human life. Let our "weapons" in the fight to defend the lives of abortion's tiny victims, be chaste weapons of the spirit.

— Robert P. George is McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence at Princeton University.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

judicial activism = Sotomayor

“Sotomayor readily admits that she applies her feelings and personal politics when deciding cases,” Long charged, citing as evidence Sotomayor’s ruling in Ricci v. DeStefano, a Connecticut-based case about racial preferences, and a 2002 speech the judge delivered at Berkeley.

Writing in POLITICO’s Arena, Roger Pilon, the vice president for legal affairs at the Cato Institute, echoed Long’s assessment and pointed to the same case – Ricci – as an example of judicial activism.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, May 26, 2009

"Replacing Michelle"

At the top right hand corner of page 17 of the New York Post of January 24th, 2009, was a short column entitled, "Replacing Michelle", in the National Review "The Week" column.

This is interesting, so here it is, word for word, as it appeared:

Some employees are simply irreplaceable. Take Michelle Obama: The University of Chicago Medical center hired her in 2002 to run "programs for community relations, neighborhood outreach, volunteer recruitment, staff diversity and minority contracting".

In 2005 the hospital raised her salary from $120,000 to $317,000 - nearly twice what her husband made as a Senator. Oh did we mention that her husband had just become a US Senator? He sure had. Requested a $1 million earmark for the UC Medical Center, in fact. Way to network Michelle!

But now that Mrs. Obama has resigned, the hospital says her position will remain unfilled. How can that be, if the work she did was vital enough to be worth $317,000?

We can think of only one explanation: Senator Roland Burris's wife wasn't interested.
Let me add that Michelle's position was a half time, 20 hour a week job. And to think they were critical of Blagoyovich's wife for taking $100,000 in fuzzy real estate commission.

My thoughts: How did this bit of quid pro quo corruption escape the sharp reporters that dug through Sarah Palin's garbage and kindergarten files?

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, May 25, 2009

North Korea Claims Successful Nuclear Test

It’s our own fault! We couldn’t get our act together this election any better than those before us who allowed this N. Korean psycho to get where he is at now with nuclear capability…

We may feel and want a philosophical global cleansing of morals and ethics throughout the globe, this corrupt psycho “Krazy Kim” is going to provide one literally if he is allowed to continue.

Clearly the ‘appeasers’ are more out-of-touch with reality than the lunatic recipient of these ridiculous policies.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, May 07, 2009

Pelosi - Pathetic. Liar!

Pelosi is left holding the bag, and it has liar and hypocrite written all over it. Here she is playing dumb.

ABC News’ Rick Klein reports: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi was briefed on the use of “enhanced interrogation techniques” on terrorist suspect Abu Zubaydah in September 2002, according to a report prepared by the Director of National Intelligence’s office and obtained by ABC News.

The report, submitted to the Senate Intelligence Committee and other Capitol Hill officials Wednesday, appears to contradict Pelosi’s statement last month that she was never told about the use of waterboarding or other special interrogation tactics. Instead, she has said, she was told only that the Bush administration had legal opinions that would have supported the use of such techniques.

The report details a Sept. 4, 2002 meeting between intelligence officials and Pelosi, then-House intelligence committee chairman Porter Goss, and two aides. At the time, Pelosi was the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee.

The meeting is described as a “Briefing on EITs including use of EITs on Abu Zubaydah, background on authorities, and a description of particular EITs that had been employed.”





*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, May 06, 2009

Senate poised to give special protection status to pedophiles

The U.S. Senate is set to give legally protected status to pedophiles and 30 other sexual orientations. The Senate refused to define what is meant by sexual orientation in S. 909, the "Hate Crimes" bill. This means that the 30 different sexual orientations will be federally protected classes.

To see the orientations that will be protected by the Hate Crimes bill (S. 909), click here or read below, I have added the list of ACLU membership profiles which happens to be the same group of social deviants.

The House has already passed this bill, and the Senate will vote as early as Wednesday. Pres. "I just wanna kill more babies" Obama has said he would sign the bill, big surprise.

Take Action!

• Call your two senators today and demand that he or she vote against S.909. Please forward this to all your family and friends. The Senate refused to define the term "sexual orientation," which means that all sexual orientations are protected. For the direct line to your senators office, click here.

Pastors, it is time to take a stand. Share this information with your members, and ask them to call.


ACLU Membership profiles has been used in S.909 as the list of social shitbags getting protection from the law; among those sexual orientations being protected by S.909 (and HR1913) are these:

1. Apotemnophilia - sexual arousal associated with the stump(s) of an Amputee (WTF?)

2. Asphyxophilia - sexual gratification derived from activities that involve oxygen deprivation through hanging, strangulation, or other means

3. Autogynephilia - the sexual arousal of a man by his own perception of himself as a woman or dressed as a woman

4. Bisexual - the capacity to feel erotic attraction toward, or to engage in sexual interaction with, both males and females

5. Coprophilia - sexual arousal associated with feces
(WTF?)

6. Exhibitionism - the act of exposing one’s genitals to an unwilling observer to obtain sexual gratification

7. Fetishism/Sexual Fetishism - obtaining sexual excitement primarily or exclusively from an inanimate object or a particular part of the body

8. Frotteurism - approaching an unknown woman from the rear and pressing or rubbing the penis against her buttocks

9. Heterosexuality - the universal norm of sexuality with those of the opposite sex (What's this here for, this is a mistake, please disregard?)

10. Homosexual/Gay/Lesbian - people who form sexual relationships primarily or exclusively with members of their own gender
(WTF?)

11. Gender Identity Disorder - a strong and persistent cross-gender identification, which is the desire to be, or the insistence that one is, or the other sex, "along with" persistent discomfort about one’s assigned sex or a sense of the inappropriateness in the gender role of that sex

12. Gerontosexuality - distinct preference for sexual relationships primarily or exclusively with an elderly partner

13. Incest - sex with a sibling or parent
(WTF?)

14. Kleptophilia - obtaining sexual excitement from stealing

15. Klismaphilia - erotic pleasure derived from enemas
(WTF?)

16. Necrophilia - sexual arousal and/or activity with a corpse
(WTF?)

17. Partialism - A fetish in which a person is sexually attracted to a specific body part exclusive of the person

18. Pedophilia - Sexual activity with a prepubescent child (generally age 13 years or younger). The individual with pedophilia must be age 16 years or older and at least 5 years older than the child. For individuals in late adolescence with pedophilia, no precise age difference is specified, and clinical judgment must be used; both the sexual maturity of the child and the age difference must be taken into account; the adult may be sexually attracted to opposite sex, same sex, or prefer either (ACLU membership dues waived)

19. Prostitution - the act or practice of offering sexual stimulation or intercourse for money

20. Sexual Masochism - obtaining sexual gratification by being subjected to pain or humiliation

21. Sexual Sadism - the intentional infliction of pain or humiliation on another person in order to achieve sexual excitement

22. Telephone Scatalogia - sexual arousal associated with making or receiving obscene phone calls

23. Toucherism - characterized by a strong desire to touch the breast or genitals of an unknown woman without her consent; often occurs in conjunction with other paraphilia

24. Transgenderism - an umbrella term referring to and/or covering transvestitism, drag queen/king, and transsexualism

25. Transsexual - a person whose gender identity is different from his or her anatomical gender

26. Transvestite - a person who is sexually stimulated or gratified by wearing the clothes of the other gender

27. Transvestic Fetishism - intense sexually arousing fantasies, sexual urges, or behaviors involving cross-dressing

28. Urophilia - sexual arousal associated with urine
(WTF?)

29. Voyeurism - obtaining sexual arousal by observing people without their consent when they are undressed or engaged in sexual activity

30. Zoophilia/Bestiality - engaging in sexual activity with animals (Yes, this includes Janeane Garofalo)

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Hello Armed American!

I get these daily emails from the US Concealed Carry Association (USCCA) addressed to "Hello Armed American!".

What a nice greeting,
"Hello Armed American!" has such a nice ring to it.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, May 05, 2009

How Would You Fix the Economy?

SOUND LIKE A PLAN?


Dear Mr. President:

Please find below my suggestion for fixing America's economy.

Instead of giving billions of dollars to companies that will squander the money on lavish parties and unearned bonuses, use the following plan.

Call it the Patriotic Retirement Plan:

There are about 40 million people over 50 in the work force.

Pay them $1 million apiece severance for early retirement with the following stipulations:

1) They MUST retire. Forty million job openings - Unemployment fixed.

2) They MUST buy a new American CAR. Forty million cars ordered - Auto Industry fixed.


3) They MUST either buy a house or pay off their mortgage - Housing Crisis fixed.


It can't get any easier than that!


If more money is needed, have all members of Congress and their constituents pay their taxes...


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Sunday, May 03, 2009

Sincerely, Every TRUE Real American

April 17, 2009

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington , DC 20500

Mr. Obama:

I have had it with you and your administration, sir. Your conduct on your recent trip overseas has convinced me that you are not an adequate representative of the United States of America collectively or of me personally.

You are so obsessed with appeasing the Europeans and the Muslim world that you have abdicated the responsibilities of the President of the United States of America. You are responsible to the citizens of the United States. You are not responsible to the peoples of any other country on earth.

I personally resent that you go around the world apologizing for the United States telling Europeans that we are arrogant and do not care about their status in the world. Sir, what do you think the First World War and the Second World War were all about if not the consideration of the peoples of Europe? Are you brain dead? What do you think the Marshall Plan was all about? Do you not understand or know the history of the 20th century?

Where do you get off telling a Muslim country that the United States does not consider itself a Christian country? Have you not read the Declaration of Independence or the Constitution of the United States? This country was founded on Judeo-Christian ethics and the principles governing this country, at least until you came along, come directly from this heritage. Do you not understand this?

Your bowing to the king of Saudi Arabia is an affront to all Americans. Our President does not bow down to anyone, let alone the king of Saudi Arabia . You don
't show Great Britain, our best and one of our oldest allies, the respect they deserve yet you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia . How dare you, sir! How dare you!

You can
't find the time to visit the graves of our greatest generation because you don't want to offend the Germans but make time to visit a mosque in Turkey . You offended our dead and every veteran when you give the Germans more respect than the people who saved the German people from themselves. What's the matter with you?

I am convinced that you and the members of your administration have the historical and intellectual depth of a mud puddle and should be ashamed of yourselves, all of you.

You are so self-righteously offended by the big bankers and the American automobile manufacturers yet do nothing about the real thieves in this situation, Mr. Dodd, Mr. Frank, Franklin Raines, Jamie Gorelic, the Fannie Mae bonuses, and the Freddie Mac bonuses. What do you intend to do about them? Anything? I seriously doubt it.

What about the U.S. House members passing out $9.1 million in bonuses to their staff members on top of the $2.5 million in automatic pay raises that lawmakers gave themselves? I understand the average House aide got a 17% bonus. I took a 5% cut in my pay to save jobs with my employer. You haven
't said anything about that. Who authorized that? I surely didn't!

Executives at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will be receiving $210 million in bonuses over an eighteen-month period, that's $45 million more than the AIG bonuses. In fact, Fannie and Freddie executives have already been awarded $51 million not a bad take. Who authorized that and why haven
't you expressed your outrage at this group who are largely responsible for the economic mess we have right now.

I resent that you take me and my fellow citizens as brain-dead and not caring about what you idiots do. We are watching what you are doing and we are getting increasingly fed up with all of you. I also want you to know that I personally find just about everything you do and say to be offensive to every one of my sensibilities. I promise you that I will work tirelessly to see that you do not get a chance to spend two terms destroying my beautiful country.

Sincerely,

Every TRUE real American



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Investment Banking explained...


Young Chuck moved to Texas and bought a donkey from a farmer for $100.

The farmer agreed to deliver the donkey the next day.

The next day the farmer drove up and said, "Sorry Chuck, but I have some bad news. The donkey died.'"

Chuck replied, "Well then, just give me my money back."

The farmer said," 'Can't do that. I went and spent it already."

Chuck said, "OK, then, just bring me the dead donkey."

The farmer asked, "What ya gonna do with a dead donkey?"

Chuck said, "I'm going to raffle him off."

The farmer said, "You can't raffle off a dead donkey!"

Chuck said, "Sure I can. Watch me. I just won't tell anybody he's dead."

A month later, the farmer met up with Chuck and asked, "What happened with that dead donkey?"

Chuck said, "I raffled him off. I sold 500 tickets at two dollars apiece and made a profit of $898.00."

The farmer said, "Didn't anyone complain?"

Chuck said, "Just the guy who won. So I gave him his two dollars back."

Chuck now works for AIG .

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Before you praise the Socialist...

From a Navy SEAL serving in the Norfolk, VA area:

Having spoken to some SEAL pals here in Virginia Beach yesterday and asking why this hostage thing dragged out for 4 days, I got the following:

1. BHO (Barack H. Obama) wouldn't authorize the DEVGRU/NSWC SEAL teams to the scene for 36 hours after going against OSC (On Scene Commander) recommendation.
2. Once the SEALS arrived, BHO imposed restrictions on their ROE (Rules of Engagement) that they couldn't do anything unless the hostage's life was in "imminent" danger.
3. The first time the hostage jumped overboard, the SEALS had the rag heads all sighted in, but could not fire due to ROE restrictions imposed by BHO.
4. When the US Navy RIB (small seal boat) came under fire as it approached with supplies, no fire was returned due to ROE restrictions. As the raggies were shooting at the RIB, they were all exposed and the SEALS had them all dialed in with their rifle sights.
5. BHO specifically denied two rescue plans developed by the Bainbridge Commander and SEAL teams.
6. Bainbridge Commander and SEAL team Commander finally decided they had the operational area and OSC authority to solely determine risk to hostage without micromanagment by OBH. 4 hours later, 3 dead raggies.
7. BHO immediately claims credit for his "daring and decisive" behavior. As usual with him, it's all bullshit.

So per our last email thread, I'm downgrading Obamadaddy's performace to D-. Only reason it's not an F is that the hostage somehow managed to survive all this 'help' from OBH.

Read the following accurate account.
--------------------

Captain Philips’ first leap into the warm, dark water of the Indian Ocean hadn’t worked out well. With the Bainbridge in range and a rescue by his country’s Navy possible, Philips threw himself off of his lifeboat prison, enabling Navy shooters onboard the destroyer a clear shot at his captors — but none was taken.

The guidance from National Command Authority — the President of the United States, Barack Obama — had been clear: a peaceful solution was the only acceptable outcome to this standoff, unless the hostage’s life was in clear, extreme danger.

The next day, a small Navy boat approaching the floating raft with supplies was fired on by the Somali pirates — but again no fire was returned and no pirates were killed. This was again due to the cautious stance assumed by Navy personnel, thanks to the combination of a lack of clear guidance from Washington and a mandate from the Commander-in-Chief’s staff not to act until Obama, a man with no background of dealing with such issues and no track record of decisiveness, decided that any outcome other than a “peaceful solution” would be acceptable.

After taking fire from the Somali kidnappers again Saturday night, the On Scene Commander decided he’d had enough.

Keeping his authority to act in the case of a clear and present danger to the hostage’s life and having heard nothing from Washington since yet another request to mount a rescue operation had been denied the day before, the Navy officer — unnamed in all media reports to date — decided the AK-47 one captor had leveled at Philips’ back was a threat to the hostage’s life and ordered the SEAL team to take their shots.

Three rounds downrange later, all three brigands became enemy KIA and Philips was safe.

There is upside, downside, and spinside to the series of events over the last week that culminated in yesterday’s dramatic rescue of an American hostage.

Almost immediately following word of the rescue, the Obama Administration and its supporters claimed victory against pirates in the Indian Ocean and [1] declared that the dramatic end to the standoff laid to rest the questions of our inexperienced President’s toughness and decisiveness.

Despite the Obama Administration’ s (and its sycophants’) attempt to spin yesterday’s success as a result of bold, decisive leadership by the inexperienced President, the reality is nothing of the sort.

What should have been a standoff lasting only a few hours — as long as it took the USS Bainbridge and its team of NSWC operators to steam to the location — became an embarrassing four-day and counting standoff between a ragtag handful of criminals with rifles and a U.S. Navy warship.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

How's That Obama Working Out For You... You Bunch of Flipin Idiots!

There was a Pied Piper who said "We live in the greatest country in the world. Help me change it!"


And the people said, "Change is good!"

Then he said, "We are going to tax the rich fat-cats,"..

And the people said "Sock it to them!"

"And redistribute their wealth."

And the people said, "Show me the money!"

And then he said, "Redistribution of wealth is good for everybody"

"And Joe the plumber said, are you kidding me?"

And Joe's personal records were hacked and publicized.

And one lone reporter asked, "Isn't that Marxist policy?"

And she was banished from the kingdom!

Then someone asked, "With no foreign relations experience, how will you deal with radical terrorists?"

And the Pied Piper said, "Simple. I'll sit down and talk with them and show them how nice we really are and they'll forget that they ever wanted to kill us all!"

Then the Pied Piper said, "I'll give 95% of you lower taxes."

And one, lone voice said, "But 40% of us don't pay ANY taxes."

So the Pied Piper said, "Then I'll give you some of the taxes the fat-cats pay!"

And the people said, "Show me the money!"

Then the Pied Piper said, "I'll tax your Capital Gains when you sell your homes!"

"And the people yawned and the slumping housing market collapsed. "

And he said, "I'll mandate employer- funded health care for EVERY worker and raise the minimum wage."

And the people said, "Gim'me some of that!"

Then he said, "I'll penalize employers who ship jobs overseas."

And the people said, "Where's my rebate check?"

Then the Pied Piper actually said, "I'll bankrupt the coal industry and electricity rates will skyrocket!"

And the people said, "Coal is dirty, coal is evil, no more coal! But we don't care for that part about higher electric rates.."

So the Pied Piper said, "Not to worry. If your rebate isn't enough to cover your expenses, we'll bail you out.. Just sign up with ACORN and your troubles are over!"

Then he said, "Illegal immigrants feel scorned and slighted. Let's grant them amnesty, Social Security, free education, free lunches, free medical care, bi-lingual signs and guaranteed housing."

And the people said, "Ole`! Bravo!" And they made him King!

And so it came to pass that employers, facing spiraling costs and ever-higher taxes, raised their prices and laid off workers. Others simply gave up and went out of business and the economy slowed even further.

Then the Pied Piper said, "I am the Messiah and I'm here to save you! We'll just print more money so everyone will have enough!"

But our foreign trading partners said, "Wait a minute. Your dollar isn't worth what it was. You'll have to pay more."

And the people said, "Wait a minute. That's not fair!"

And the world said, "Neither are these other, idiotic programs you've embraced. You've become a Socialist state and a second-rate power. Now you'll play by our rules!"

And the people said, "What have we done?"

But it was too late.

If you think this is a fairy tale, open your eyes and ears. It's happening RIGHT NOW!

Did you know the president's name is really an acronym.

One Big Ass Mistake America

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, March 26, 2009

I Hate the ACLU... they just suck!


Want to install Muslim footbaths in a public school at taxpayer expense? The ACLU will look the other way. But they won't sit idly by and allow autistic children to get a better education if it involves vouchers! They should be ashamed, but their proud of this win. Please share with your readers, thanks, Jay (stop the aclu)

John and Dina Phipps and Brendan and Susan Fay, founders of Father’s Heart Christian School for the disabled, removed their developmentally and physically challenged children from the Arizona public school system because of the inadequate education they received there. Two of the children suffer from autism and the other from learning and physical challenges.

Upon receiving the customized instruction they needed at Father’s Heart, their behavior and participation improved remarkably and their academic performance rose several grade levels in just one year after leaving the government school system. The children receive vouchers through the Arizona Scholarships for Pupils with Disabilities program to attend Father’s Heart, but Wednesday’s decision from the Arizona Supreme Court effectively kills the program.

Cave Creek Unified School District board member Virgel Cain, the ACLU, People for the American Way, a number of teachers’ unions, and others filed suit against Arizona State Superintendant of Public Instruction Tom Horne to challenge the constitutionality of the voucher program.





*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Your Own Words - nation of perdants - "losers"

The President of one of the world's biggest advertising agencies has issued a damning state-of-the-nation assessment that describes France as being in steep decline and his countrymen as "narrowed and stunted".

Maurice Lévy, the head of the media giant Publicis, whose company owns Saatchi and Saatchi and has offices in 100 countries across six continents, said France had failed to get the 2012 Olympics because the world now saw it as a nation of perdants - "losers".

For good measure, he described the 35-hour week as "absurd" and the wails of complaint that followed Paris's loss of the Games to London as "pathetic".

His forthright critique was published in the opinion section on the front page of the respected daily newspaper Le Monde.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Obama’s 3 Big Lies

His Plan to Destroy the GOP


Dear fellow American:

Let me tell you the real reason Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid pushed through the biggest spending bill in history – without proper debate, without Republican input, and without any public scrutiny at all.

Simply, they are trying to turn the United States into a one-party country and to put the Republican Party out of business once and for all.

The massive appropriation called a stimulus – some $787 billion of your money – is really a political war chest for the Democrats.

They want to change the face of American politics forever, and they want to use your taxpayer money to do it.

They want to use billions from our treasury to reward their political friends – and have huge amounts of cash to dole out before the 2010 and 2012 elections.

Some people have wondered why, if the country is in dire need of emergency “stimulus,” most of the money appropriated by this law will not even be spent this year.

Instead, spending will go on for five to 10 years.

There is no mystery here, as the answer is simple: These billions in taxpayer funds will fund the Democratic political machine for many years to come.

Chicago Machine Takes over Washington

You must remember – the media won’t tell you this – that Barack Obama is a product of the corrupt political machine in Chicago headed by Mayor Richard Daley.

Chicago is run as a one-party city. The Democratic political machine and the government are one in the same.

Just like we saw recently in Congress, there is no real debate in Chicago. Deals are brokered in the back rooms among the ward leaders, the mayor and their cronies.

What the political machine decides, the public has to accept it. The city council serves simply as a rubber stamp – much the same way the Congress just acted for Obama.

And public money in Chicago is used to protect and serve the interests of the machine.

Obama – as I will reveal to you with the stimulus plan – is simply replicating the Chicago machine in Washington.

It is a frightening thought because our freedoms depend on a vibrant two-party system.

But that’s what you believe, not what Obama and his crew believe.

Barack Obama and his Chicago gang, which includes his Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel, also a congressman from the Chicago machine, have a starkly different view.

They want a one-party system headed by a strong man.

We at the National Republican Trust PAC are deeply troubled not only by how much the stimulus plan spends but also the way it was implemented.

We just witnessed how the basic and open democratic process of our republic was flouted.

We fear that the actions by Obama and Congress that we just witnessed threaten the very foundation of our republic.

Consider that we have long believed America is the greatest democracy in the world.

Yet Congress passed the largest spending bill in its history – by essentially suspending vital democratic processes, including debate and public examination of the pending law.

We know that the Democrats, working late into the night, secretly agreed to a “compromise” bill among themselves – and then refused even to share it with Republicans or the public until just hours before the bill went to the floor for a vote.

The final stimulus bill was 1,079 pages long. We know Barack Obama never read the bill.

Many members of Congress have admitted not one senator or congressman even read the bill before they voted for it!

The Democrats say they suspended normal procedures because the country so desperately needed to avoid what Barack Obama said was an economic “catastrophe.”

The bill apparently was so urgent that the Democrats even excluded Republican leaders from any involvement in negotiations on it.

When, in our republic, does Congress simply vote on a bill when its members have no idea what it says?

And, how could congressional leaders like Pelosi and Reid, as well as President Obama, present a monumental law but not allow even one day of scrutiny by Congress, its staffs or the public?

Help us fight the takeover of Congress and Washington – Go Here Now

Big Lie No. 1: The Emergency

They told us that the country is in such a dire situation that it was an emergency.

That was Big Lie No. 1: The bill was not an emergency measure.

This was a ruse. They falsely claimed it was an emergency bill to cut off all debate.

The lie about the urgency was made clear when President Obama, rather than immediately signing the bill, went on vacation to celebrate Valentine’s Day with his wife in Chicago. [Amazingly he had been in Washington less than a month before he took his first vacation!]

In fact, Obama took almost four days to sign this “urgent” bill.

Big Lie No. 2: Immediate Stimulus

And then there is Big Lie No. 2: The bill offered immediate help to our ailing economy.

The truth: The bill does not offer significant, immediate stimulus.

Most of the stimulus money won’t even be spent this year, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office!

And the CBO has warned that the bill actually will hurt long-term economic growth.

Infrastructure programs, including items such as $8 billion for a high-speed train between Los Angeles and Las Vegas, will take a decade or longer to complete – if environmentalists ever let the project begin.

Republican traitor Arlen Specter, who backed the stimulus bill, got more than $6 billion in the bill for “medical research” – another lulu that has nothing to do with immediate economic stimulus.

Big Lie No. 3: Bipartisan Support

Then there is Big Lie No. 3: This bill was a bipartisan effort to save the economy.

It was anything but.

Republican Sen. Lindsay Graham said bluntly: “If this is going to be bipartisanship, the country's screwed."

Indeed, every Republican in the House voted against the bill, along with six courageous Democratic congressmen.

In the Senate, almost every Republican opposed the bill except three liberals: Sens. Olympia Snowe, Susan Collins and Arlen Specter.

Obama promised he would change the “old politics” of Washington. Instead, he is playing hardball partisan Democratic politics of the Chicago type.

He has used the weakening economy as his Reichstag fire event to get to pass an incredible amount of money so he could funnel huge amounts of pork and political payoffs to his Democratic cronies and allies.

And now, he is even talking about a second stimulus program! Why not? Congress just passed his first bill without even reading it! What a joke . . .

Help us expose Obama’s Big Lies – Donate to Our Campaign – Go Here Now

The Real Purpose: Abolish the GOP

I have no doubt what the real purpose of the stimulus bill was.

Simply, it was to lay the ground work of the remaking of America’s political system into a one-party system.

Yes, a one-party socialist state that destroyed countries like Mexico.

We have seen what one-party rule has done to cities like Cleveland, Detroit, other cities – and corrupt Chicago.

The media will never tell you this, but that’s the real agenda behind the Obama stimulus bill.

This is why so little of the stimulus is spent now, but spread out over several years.

This means Obama and Democrats will have hundreds of billions to disburse to their supporters, creating a new party cadre that will help them win re-election in 2010 and 2012.

Don’t believe me?

Well, we all know the fraud perpetrated by groups like ACORN to register Democratic voters.

In the run-up to the 2009 election, millions of new “voters” were registered – and it clearly helped elect Obama – and gave the Democrats big majorities in the House and Senate.

Their game plan for 2008 worked. Now they want to use public funds – our tax dollars – to pay for more of their political activities.

For example, the final stimulus bill gives $3 billion to groups like ACORN.

Consider that, in 2008, Obama claimed that he raised $750 million for his campaign. Compared with that amount, ACORN’s $3 billion is staggering.

No doubt, these billions will help ACORN in its political work of “community organizing” – a euphemism for Democratic activitism.

We don’t have billions – we need your help to fight – Go Here Now

But it’s not just ACORN who is getting “stimulus.”

The bulk of the Obama stimulus goes directly to the powerful government employee unions that helped get Obama elected and are the backbone, the shock troops, of the Democratic Party.

Amazingly, it’s been estimated that half of the stimulus appropriation directly benefits government employee and service employees union that played key roles in Obama’s election.

Second, the bill gives tens of billions to state and local governments to dole out to their cronies. This means there will be even less accountability by Congress.

And then there are massive payoffs to the special interests to the Democratic Party, with giveaways such as $50 million for the National Endowment for the Arts, $300 million for new cars for government bureaucrats, $1.2 billion for “youth activities,” tens of billions for “green, environmental and energy programs” — they even include $3.7 billion to help “green” military bases and another $125 million to restore “abandoned mines.”

Shockingly, the bill creates 33 new government programs!

The stimulus money will give the Democrats the opportunity to become the dominant political party for the next generation.

Counter the Democratic machine by helping us today – Go Here Now

Our Plan to Stop Obama

Despite the massive political payouts Obama, Reid and Pelosi are funneling to their allies across the country, they can still be stopped.

The polls show Americans want a two-party system. They don’t want corrupt, Chicago-style politics in Washington.

They don’t want their taxpayer funds used for political shenanigans and payoffs.

We at the National Republican Trust PAC want to expose the incredible rip-off the stimulus bill will be to the taxpayers.

If Americans knew that the bill would place an additional $9,400 in debt upon each household in America, they would be appalled.

If Americans knew the extent to which this bill is going for political payoffs to groups like ACORN, they would be outraged.

We know that Americans will wake up to what Congress has perpetrated on them with this stimulus.

But we also know we can’t rely on the media to tell the facts.

This is why we want to keep up our media efforts to expose Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid.

We now know they have a radical plan for the nation.

There are already calls among Democrats for a new Fairness Doctrine to close down talk radio and hosts like Rush, Hannity, Boortz, Beck, Savage and others.

The Democrats are already talking about legalizing 12 million illegals, making them citizens and voters overnight.

They know that, if they do this, they will instantly change the political landscape in the nation for a generation or more.

This is why your support for the National Republican Trust is critical – Go Here Now

This is why we urgently have launched a media campaign in exposing Sen. Specter in Pennsylvania and Sens. Snowe and Collins in Maine. We want their constituents to know exactly how their senators voted against the public’s best interests.

We also have targeted Democratic senators like Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas.

We are doing this because we know that Obama is passing sweeping legislation, and that we need to put these senators and congressmen on notice: If they vote for Obama’s plan, they will pay a heave price back home among their voters.

We at the National Republican Trust PAC have already played a critical role. We were a key factor in Sen. Saxby Chambliss’ landslide victory in the special Senate run-off in Georgia.

CNN has called us one of the most “powerful” political action committees in the nation.

Dick Morris, the Fox News analyst, has called the National Republican Trust the most important political force in the nation. He says we are now doing the work of the Republican Party.

But our success depends on people like you.

We don’t have fat-cat donors and corporate sponsors.

We depend on Americans like you who care about this country and who want us to keep fighting.

Your donations help us not only to fight but also to prepare for the coming major battles ahead with Obama, Pelosi and Reid.

We need your support today, please donate – Go Here Now.

Thank you and God bless you.

Yours for America,

Scott Wheeler
Executive Director

P.S. As the full details of the stimulus come to light, the American people will be shocked, and many of the backers will regret their votes for this shameful bill. Our job is to expose those that voted for the bill. If we do so, it is doubtful Obama will have the votes in the Senate to pass more of his radical agenda. But we need your support to stop him. It’s urgent you help us today, please do so – Go Here Now


Paid for by The National Republican Trust PAC.
Not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.
2100 M St. NW Suite 170-340 Washington, DC 20037-1233

Contributions to The National Republican Trust PAC are not
deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes.
No corporate funds are accepted.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

economic crisis was coming?

This video shows that George Bush tried to warn Congress starting in 2001 that this economic crisis was coming, if something was not done. But congress refused to listen, along with Barney "pole smoker" Franks.

This video says it all.

The liberal AMERICAN media did not want this video on Y ou Tube, so they had Time Warner threaten a law suit (proprietary rights) if it was not taken off.

This link is of the same video but is routed through
Canada .





*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

Are we THAT stupid? Clearly we are!

WHY ARE WE BANKRUPT?

1. $11 Billion to $22 billion is spent on welfare to illegal aliens each year by state governments.

Verify at: http://tinyurl.com/zob77

2. $2.2 Billion dollars a year is spent on food assistance programs such as food stamps, WIC, and free school lunches for illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

3. $2.5 Billion dollars a year is spent on Medicaid for illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://www.cis.org/articles/2004/fiscalexec.html

4. $12 Billion dollars a year is spent on primary and secondary school education for children here illegally and they cannot speak a word of English!

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

5. $17 Billion dollars a year is spent for education for the American-born children of illegal aliens, known as anchor babies.

Verify at http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

6. $3 Million Dollars a DAY is spent to incarcerate illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

7. 30% percent of all Federal Prison inmates are illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

8. $90 Billion Dollars a year is spent on illegal aliens for Welfare & social services by the American taxpayers.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0610/29/ldt.01.html

9. $200 Billion dollars a year in suppressed American wages are caused by the illegal aliens.

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/01/ldt.01.html

10. The illegal aliens in the United States have a crime rate that's two and a half times that of white non-illegal aliens. In particular, their children, are going to make a huge additional crime problem in the US .

Verify at: http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0606/12/ldt.01.html

11. During the year of 2005 there were 4 to 10 MILLION illegal aliens that crossed our Southern Border also, as many as 19,500 illegal aliens from Terrorist Countries. Millions of pounds of drugs, cocaine, meth, heroin and marijuana, crossed into the U. S. from the Southern border.

Verify at: Homeland Security Report: http://tinyurl.com/t9sht or http://www.house.gov/mccaul/pdf/Investigaions-Border-Report.pdf

12. The National Policy Institute, estimated that the total cost of mass deportation would be between $206 and $230 billion or an average cost of between $41 and $46 Billion annually over a five year period.

Verify at: http://www.nationalpolicyinstitute.org/publications.php?b=deportation
Select Mass Deportation, enter email address, doc will be available free of charge. You will be provided a link and a password in the email to get document from National Policy Institute.

13. In 2006 illegal aliens sent home $45 BILLION in remittances to their countries of origin.

Verify at: http://www.rense.com/general75/niht.htm

14. The Dark Side of Illegal Immigration: Nearly one million sex crimes committed by Illegal Immigrants in the United States.

Verify at: http://www.usillegalaliens.com/

The total cost is a whopping $338.3 BILLION DOLLARS A YEAR.

Are we THAT stupid? Clearly we are.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Saturday, February 21, 2009

Obama Embarrassed Americans Cannot Speak French

Obama gives a lesson on language and offensive American behavior. Obama is embarrassed that Americans cannot speak "The Language of the Coward" a.k.a. French when we go on all of our trips to France. Thus the Stimulus includes a total of $110 billion to teach U.S. Infidels functional French. Obama states, "With these new skills provided by tax-payer funds, all the 'Joe the Plumbers' will be effectively French."

1. $50 Billion on how to correctly waive a white flag and conflict avoidance/retreat.
2. $10 Billion on arrogance snob face-making.

3. $10 Billion on castration of functioning penis males.
4. $15 Billion on gay frilly blouses, tight jeans, and creepy vinyl half-boots for the Men.
5. $25 Billion on teaching the technique of always being on the wrong side of history; this requires all men of character and integrity to have these non-French moral compass traits removed by repeated butt plugging (see #2 above).

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Obama puts NAMBLA groupie Ogden at DoJ

Liberals are long known for light sentences for child molesters, opposition to child rape and child porn laws, and the speedy expediting of "freedom of speech" protections to pornographers, pedophiles, and male homosexuals who belong to the group NAMBLA. Slightly less well known but easily documented are the sympathies the left has towards lowering the age of consent laws so that it's not really a crime for adults and children to have sex. This past week the Obama administration pushed the nomination of David Ogden to the Justice Department. Ogden is well known for his desire not to prosecute those who fall into most of these categories.

'David Ogden has advocated the interests of the porn industry [in] a child-pornography case, Knox v. United States.' When Knox appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, President Clinton's Solicitor General, Drew Days, refused to defend his conviction. Congress condemned Days by a Senate vote of 100-0 votes and a House vote of 425-3. Congress then hired a private legal firm to support Knox's conviction.

Among Ogden's more controversial cases he:

-- filed a friend-of-the-court brief on behalf of the ACLU and two other groups in the early 1990s arguing that a child pornographer had been improperly prosecuted because the pornographer's material did not contain fully exposed views of genitalia.

-- submitted a friend-of-the court brief earlier this decade for more than a dozen library directors, urging the overturning of a law that required porn-blocking Internet filters be placed on public library computers if the libraries receive federal funds.

-- represented Playboy in a mid-1980s case when it was seeking to have the Library of Congress -- which had stopped such practices -- translate the magazine into Braille. He also represented Playboy several years later in a lawsuit targeting Puerto Rico's decision to remove obscene material from cable television.

-- represented PHE, Inc., one of the nation's largest distributors of hard-core pornography, in an early 1990s case.

His nomination has pornography supporters excited and opponents distressed. Colin Hardacre, a Los Angeles attorney who represents porn businesses, told a porn industry news website that "it is a nice change of pace to see the president choosing smart people with experience."

"This is a good sign for the adult industry," he said.

Pro-family leaders agree on that one point.

"Mr. Ogden's jurisprudential background is truly astounding," the Alliance Defense Fund wrote in its memo to Judiciary Committee members. "He has repeatedly been an advocate of sexually oriented businesses, including distributors of hard-core pornography."

Patrick Trueman, former chief of the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section of the Justice Department, told Focus on the Family's CitizenLink that Ogden is "everything the pro-family movement has fought against."

Said Land, "In the Reagan administration, the Justice Department prosecuted pornographers, and the Obama administration has hired a man who defended pornographers to be the No. 2 man in the Justice Department. I can't think of a sharper contrast. It's sad and it's tragic and it should send all the wrong signals to all the right people about where the Obama administration's Justice Department is headed when it comes to the obscenity and pornography issue."

During his Senate testimony Ogden countered any criticism of his representation of pornographers by pointing to his work in the Clinton Department of Justice and his defense during that time of the nation's anti-porn laws. He served in three positions in the Clinton Justice Department, the last being as assistant attorney general for the department's civil division.

But Ogden's controversial positions don't stop with pornography.

On the issue of abortion, he filed a brief for the American Psychological Association in Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992), arguing that "abortion rarely causes ... psychological or emotional problems" and that a post-abortive woman is "more likely to experience feelings of relief and happiness." He urged the court to strike down 24-hour waiting periods and spousal notification laws as unconstitutional. Several years earlier, he represented APA in urging the striking down of a parental-consent law.

On the issue of homosexuality, he represented several organizations in the late 1980s in arguing against the Army's exclusion of homosexuals in the military. He also represented the American Psychological Association earlier this decade in urging the U.S. Supreme Court to overturn anti-sodomy laws, writing that homosexuality is a "normal form of human sexuality." The Alliance Defense Fund says Ogden supports the use of "strict scrutiny" for equal-protection challenges brought by homosexual couples -- a legal doctrine that most courts have rejected.

"He has asserted that 'gay men and lesbians constitute a discrete and insular minority deserving strict equal protection scrutiny," ADF says. "... The only judicial opinion adopting that approach -- the California Supreme Court's decision ... has been resoundingly rejected by the people of California...."

Sen. Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma and a member of the Judiciary Committee, asked Ogden in written questions whether he personally believed there was a federal constitutional right to "same-sex marriage." Ogden, though, didn't budge.

"I have not studied this issue and therefore have not developed a personal view as to whether there is a constitutional right to same-sex marriage," Ogden wrote in reply.

Coburn also asked Ogden whether the nominee -- in light of his past legal positions -- would be able to defend the federal Defense of Marriage Act effectively in any theoretical court case. DOMA prevents the federal government from recognizing "gay marriage" and gives states the option of doing the same.

"As a general matter," Ogden wrote, "it is appropriate for the Department of Justice to enforce any law for which a reasonable argument can be made that it is constitutional. Under that standard, I would expect to be able to enforce DOMA."




*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Grooming the perfect Marxist

Obama’s Revenge

By Joan Swirsky Sunday, February 15, 2009

Once upon a time, a white teenager from Kansas got pregnant by her black Kenyan boyfriend, Barack Obama Sr., or was it her husband? Whatever. (I say whatever because we’ve never seen either marriage or divorce certificates). Some say the couple was in Kenya visiting relatives when the birth of their son, Barack Obama Jr., occurred. No matter. (I say no matter because we’ve never seen an authentic birth certificate). By the time the baby was two years old his father abandoned him for his other wife and child in Kenya.

I wonder how toddler Barry felt when his father left him, and never reappeared until a single time when the boy was 10. Bewildered? Sad? Lonely? Angry? What do two-year-olds do with those feelings?

It didn’t take long for Barry’s mother to meet and marry an Indonesian native named Lolo Soetoro. They moved to Indonesia, where her child became Barry Soetoro, took on Indonesian citizenship, and was presumably schooled in public, Christian, and Muslim schools. (I say presumably because we’ve never seen those school records). But when Barry was 10 years old, his mother sent him back to the U.S. to be raised by her parents, Madelyn and Stanley Dunham, although she kept her baby daughter Maya Soetoro with her.

I wonder how the by-now fully-sentient young Barry felt when his mother sent him packing. Sad? Jealous of the baby who remained behind with mommy? Confused and dizzy by the disparate cultures – languages, customs, foods, sights, sounds, schooling – he had experienced? Resentful? What did Barry do with those feelings?

By the time he was 10, the boy had been abandoned three times – by his father, stepfather, and mother. And although he was raised by his white grandparents in Hawaii – where “people of color” were not his color – he found out soon enough that his mixed-race background rendered him, in effect, an outsider. Did that make him feel self-conscious, indignant, victimized?

But he wasn’t altogether an outsider. In Hawaii, young Barry met Frank Marshall Davis, his first and perhaps most influential mentor. The infamous Marshall, a Communist activist (and self-confessed pedophile) taught Barry – was it Obama, Soetero, Dunham? – that white people were the devil incarnate and that blacks were the most “victimized” people on earth.

Yet the abandoned and rejected child was lucky. His white-devil grandparents gave him a comfortable life in Hawaii, and an education that apparently qualified him to attend several prestigious schools – Occidental College in CA, Columbia Univ. in NY City, and Harvard Law School in Cambridge, MA.(I say apparently qualified because we’ve never seen any of his college transcripts).

BARRY MORPHS INTO BARACK


After his undergraduate days at Columbia, Obama chose not to go to graduate school, but instead held various jobs in the Big Apple and then moved to Chicago to become a community organizer. Although he had been exposed to American exceptionalism through his life in the United States and his privileged education, it is clear that his experiences in impoverished Kenya and totalitarian Indonesia, as well as his exposure to Marshall and the other radicals he had met during his years in New York – among them the unrepentant domestic terrorists William Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn of Weather Underground infamy – made the deepest and most lasting impressions.

Their messages of American imperialism and its white-devil culture clearly resonated in the thrice-abandoned boy. In his young-adult and adult years, free to choose his friends and pursuits, he opted exclusively for far-left socialists and Marxists, and activities aimed at relieving the suffering of people he perceived to be as victimized as apparently he felt he had been. He understood their feelings of helplessness, hopelessness, and impotent rage, as well as the pain of fatherlessness. After all, his Harvard-educated father consciously chose to leave him. And his mother gave him away. Was that depressing to Barry? Infuriating?

When given the opportunity to join one of dozens of churches in Chicago, Barry – who had morphed into Barack – opted for the Trinity United Church of Christ, which was led by the fire-breathing Rev. Jeremiah Wright, whose decades-long anti-American and anti-Semitic rants apparently resonated in Obama’s rejected and abandoned heart and soul. (I say apparently resonated because in over 20 years of regular attendance, Obama said he heard nothing inflammatory or anti-American, and we’ve never seen the videotapes of any sermon, although each one was unfailingly recorded).

“God damn America,” Wright raged. “The chickens have come home to roost,” he “preached” to his whooping and hollering congregation after 9/11. Obama heard nothing.

But it wasn’t only Wright who Obama was attracted to in Chicago. He was also drawn to another hate-spewing radical, Rev. Louis Farrakhan, as well as to the raving Father Michael Phleger, the radical Islamist Khalid Rashidi, his friends and neighbors the Ayers, and to equally-close friends “Tony” and Rita Rezko – Tony being the notorious “fixer” and now-convicted-and-imprisoned felon for fraud, bribery, and money laundering. What did the seemingly mild-mannered Obama find so irresistible in these angry and/or crooked people and others like them? Was it the same thing that a shy man finds in his attraction to a flamboyant girlfriend – and alter-ego, a person who expresses what he really feels but is unable to give voice to?

In these relationships and in community organizing – which offers inner-city mostly-black residents job training, tutoring, and methods to organize tenants’-rights groups and voter-registration drives, etc. – the twenty-something Obama apparently found his calling, and also a renewed and burning ambition.

WITH FRIENDS LIKE THESE


While his community-organizing job paid a paltry $12,000 or so per year, Obama somehow managed to pay his way through one of the priciest graduate schools in the world, Harvard Law School. (I say somehow managed because we have no record of his tuition payments). Even more amazing, he became the first black president of the Harvard Law Review without ever producing a written paper – or at least a paper that the public has ever read.

There is a good deal of evidence that Obama’s acceptance at Harvard Law – and his tuition – were facilitated by friends who had a vested interest in the community organizer. Among them was Percy Sutton, a former Manhattan borough president and ardent leftist, who was also Malcolm X’s lawyer. In an interview last year, the octogenarian Sutton stated: “I was introduced to [Obama] by a friend. The friend’s name was Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, and the introduction took place about 20 years ago.” Sutton described al-Mansour as “the principle adviser to one of the world’s richest men” and suggested that al-Mansour was raising money for Obama. Knowing that Sutton had friends at Harvard, al-Mansour asked him if he would write a letter to Harvard recommending Obama, which Sutton did most agreeably. This took place about 1988 when 27-year-old Obama was applying to Harvard Law.

Journalist Jack Cashill has credibly speculated that Obama’s two memoirs were actually written by his pal Bill Ayers, who was and is a University of Illinois at Chicago English professor, having escaped life in prison on a technicality. Two years [after he was admitted to law school], Cashill writes, “while still a law student, Obama improbably received an advance to write a memoir that would be called `Dreams From My Father: A Story of Race and Inheritance,’ which was published in 1995.” His second memoir, published in 2006, was “The Audacity of Hope: Thoughts on Reclaiming the American Dream.” (I suspect Cashill said “improbably received an advance” because, as stated earlier, Obama had not produced even one paper or distinguished himself in any way to have inspired a major publishing company to approach him).

Al this begs the question: Who writes two memoirs about himself before the age of 45? My own speculation is that it could be no one but a narcissist. As most people know in this age of pop psychology, the psychiatric disorder of narcissism derives from the Greek myth in which Narcissus, a handsome young man, became obsessed with himself and fell in love with his own image as he gazed into a pool of water. A lot of people have some degree of narcissism, which is characterized by grandiosity, an unquenchable need for admiration, unhealthy self-absorption, dependence on the affirmation of others, and also a lack of empathy, which is hidden by both personal charm and the kind of earnest language that pretends to “feel your pain.”

Or he could be a malignant narcissist., which psychiatrist Dr. Otto Kernberg, a legendary leader in thought disorders, compares to a narcissist on steroids. This variety involves paranoid traits (think of Obama’s thin-skinned, quasi-hysterical reactions to Rush Limbaugh and Sarah Palin), and ego-syntonic aggression, which means the person is perfectly in-sync with people who have the courage he lacks to lash out.

But consider the source! Obama’s father was a self-aggrandizing narcissist who thought nothing of throwing his son away to fulfill his own ambitions and his mother also threw him away for the same reason. Talk about DNA, which Obama perfectly exhibited when, during his campaign, he unflinchingly dispensed with both his white grandmother and his black “mentor” Rev. Wright for his personal ambition.

GROOMING THE PERFECT MARXIST CANDIDATE

This leads me to only one conclusion, which I wrote about in a former article: “Obama: The Trojan Horse.” My theory is that President Obama’s narcissistic charm, even temperament, skill with words (teleprompter included), hunger to please, radical agenda, and subterranean rage at the “unfair” American system have been brilliantly exploited by powerful leftist radicals and Marxists in the United States, who for decades have plotted America’s path to socialism. He is their pawn, totally dispensable but handy while the “aura” lasts.

These “handlers” saw in Obama the ideal blank slate on which to actualize their agenda, and they made sure the slate remained blank by concealing (or destroying) any evidence of his past, including his birth certificate, Selective Service record, visa(s), school transcripts, and other vital documents. All of which is costing his moneyed backers – including America-loathing billionaire George Soros – multimillions in lawyers’ fees to fight the proliferating lawsuits that seek the truth about this stealth president.

In fact, former ambassador Alan Keyes, one of the many plaintiffs seeking proof of Obama’s American citizenship, has reported that Obama’s lawyers have now filed a motion “to quash our effort to obtain the relevant documents…[which] confirms Obama’s ruthless determination to destroy anyone who continues to seek the information the Constitution requires. Obama thus signals his intent to bring financial ruin on those who won’t accept his cover-up of the circumstances of his birth is a tactical escalation. It confirms the common sense suspicion that he won’t act forthrightly in this matter because he has something to hide.”

It is clear that Obama and his fellow radicals are restive. In the less-than four weeks of his presidency, the new president has taken volumes from the Marxian handbook, which dictates that the stupid masses be blitzed with an overload of information, hollow press conferences, appointments, dismantling of formerly effective national-security programs, et al., in order to set the stage for a massive, Soviet-style takeover of our government, including a civilian national security force that Obama has said should be “just as powerful, strong and well-funded as the U.S. military.” Echoes of Nazi Germany in 1938, anyone?

According to writer Kyle-Anne Shrive, in Obama’s ascendance:

“We have yet to see a more perfect collision of Murphy’s Law with the Peter Principle. In only three weeks’ time, [he] has signaled to every terrorist on the planet that we are a sorry, groveling, ashamed nation ready to come to the diplomatic confessional. He is closing Gitmo within one year, has suspended trials there, and dismissed the charges against the U.S.S. Cole plotter. [He] has just put our money where his mouth is and is using $20.3 million to bring in Palestinian refugees from Gaza…[he] had the gall to pronounce the so-called economic stimulus bill absolutely free of `earmarks’ and `make-do work’…but according to the Congressional Budget Office [this bill] will do worse to our overall economy than no government action whatsoever.”

And Obama has done all this with the predictable double-speak that characterizes malevolent intention, i.e., touting transparency while concealing everything, speaking of integrity while appointing crooks and incompetents riddled with conflicts-of-interest, supporting energy independence while killing off-shore and domestic oil-drilling and nuclear power, and feigning optimism while he speaks of impending “catastrophe” in order to push through a pork-laden, trillion-dollar-plus Stimulus plan that rewards the corrupt voter-fraud organization Acorn with billions and unions with discriminatory union-only labor agreements, paves the way for socialized medicine, and threatens to take away the most cherished rights of We The People.

As blogger Eric Gurr has said: “We still talk about the health care crisis, the environmental crisis, the oil crisis, the banking crisis. Let me tell you my friends you are about to learn the meaning of the only crisis that matters, the survival crisis.”

You can be sure that the sad-lonely-angry two-year-old, the jealous-confused-resentful 10-year-old, the self-conscious- cheated-victimized adolescent, and the man who found solace in and identified with his hate-America mentors is now determined to redeem all of his demons.

Unfortunately, he is acting out his rage on free-market capitalism, a free press, property and gun rights, a limited constitutional government, protection of the unborn, and everything else that is good and great about our country.

This is Obama’s revenge!

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, February 19, 2009

John "freaking psycho shitbag" Hinkley To Be Released

You might recall that John Hinckley was a seriously deranged young man who shot President Reagan in the early 1980s. Hinckley was absolutely obsessed with movie star Jodie Foster, extremely jealous, and in his twisted mind, loved Jodie Foster to the point that to make himself well known to her, he attempted to assassinate President Reagan. There is speculation Hinckley may soon be released as having been rehabilitated. Consequently, you may appreciate the following letter from John McCain that the staff at the mental facility, treating Hinckley, reports to have intercepted this past weekend:

To: John Hinckley

From: John McCain

My wife and I wanted to drop you a short note to tell you how pleased we are with the great strides you are making in your recovery. In our fine country's spirit of understanding and forgiveness, we want you to know there is a non partisan consensus of compassion and forgiveness throughout.

My wife Cindy and I want you to know that no grudge is borne against you for shooting President Reagan. We, above all, are aware of how the mental stress and pain could have driven you to such an act of desperation. We are confident that you will soon make a complete recovery and return to your family to join the world again as a healthy and productive young man.

Best Wishes,
John and Cindy McCain

PS: While you have been incarcerated, Barack Obama has been banging Jodie Foster like a screen door in a tornado. Just thought you should know.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, February 18, 2009

Quote from Norman Thomas

"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened."

Quote by: Norman Thomas, (1884-1968) six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America

Source: 1948 - from an interview during the presidential campaign, [Ed. note: Norman Thomas and Gus Hall, the U.S. Communist Party Candidate, both quit American politics, agreeing that the Republican and Democratic parties by 1970 had adopted every plank on the Communist/Socialist and they no longer had an alternate party platform on which to run.].

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, February 16, 2009

WHO IS GOING TO FINISH THEIR SOCIALIST CONVERSION FIRST?

CHAVEZ - VENEZUELA
or
PELOSI - THE PEOPLE REPUBLIC OF SAN FRANCISCO
(formally known as the very proud United States of America)



It is common knowledge that CHAVEZ is completely psycho and is a sponsor of terror and brutality on his own people. It is also common knowledge that PELOSI is completely psychotic and delusional, her unbound incompetence and agenda to bring the great country to ruin.



Chavez calls Venezuela vote mandate for socialism

CARACAS, Venezuela –
President Hugo Chavez says a referendum victory that removed limits on his re-election is a mandate to intensify his socialist agenda for decades to come. Opponents warn of an impending dictatorship.

Both sides had called the outcome of Sunday's vote key to the future of this South American country, split down the middle between those who worship the president for redistributing Venezuela's oil riches and those who see him as a power-hungry autocrat.

"Those who voted "yes" today voted for socialism, for revolution," Chavez thundered to thousands of ecstatic supporters jamming the streets around the presidential palace. Fireworks lit up the Caracas skyline, and one man walked though the crowd carrying a painting of Chavez that read: "Forever."

Josefa Dugarte stared at the crowd from the stoop of her apartment building with look of dismay.

"These people don't realize what they have done," she muttered.

With 94 percent of the vote counted, official results showed the amendment passing 54 percent to 46 percent, an irreversible trend, and opposition leaders accepted the results. Tibisay Lucena, president of National Electoral Council, said turnout was 67 percent.


Posted on Fri May 21 21:13:17 2004 by jmstein7

Surprise! Nancy Pelosi is really, and officially, a self-confessed Socialist!

Nancy Pelosi is a Socialist. She, like Bernard Sanders, is a member of the Democratic Socialists of America. You can check out the membership list here.

Here is the mission statement of the Democratic Socialists of America, from their homepage:

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) is the largest socialist organization in the United States, and the principal U.S. affiliate of the Socialist International. DSA's members are building progressive movements for social change while establishing an openly socialist presence in American communities and politics.

At the root of our socialism is a profound commitment to democracy, as means and end. We are activists committed not only to extending political democracy but to demanding democratic empowerment in the economy, in gender relations, and in culture. Democracy is not simply one of our political values but our means of restructuring society. Our vision is of a society in which people have a real voice in the choices and relationships that affect the entirety of our lives. We call this vision democratic socialism — a vision of a more free, democratic and humane society.

In this web site you can find out about DSA, its politics, structure and program. DSA's political perspective is called Where We Stand. It says, in part,

We are socialists because we reject an international economic order sustained by private profit, alienated labor, race and gender discrimination, environmental destruction, and brutality and violence in defense of the status quo.

We are socialists because we share a vision of a humane international social order based both on democratic planning and market mechanisms to achieve equitable distribution of resources, meaningful work, a healthy environment, sustainable growth, gender and racial equality, and non-oppressive relationships.

DSA has a youth section, Young Democratic Socialists (YDS). Made up of students from colleges and high schools and young people in the work force, the Youth Section works on economic justice and democracy and prison justice projects. It is a member of the Interantional Union of Socialist Youth, an affiliate of the Socialist International. The Youth Section meets several times during the year. More information is available from YDS staff.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Saturday, February 14, 2009

County to pay $250,000 to advertise lack of funds.

Publication: The Register-Guard (Eugene, OR)
Date: Thursday, January 26 2006
Byline: Matt Cooper The Register-Guard.

Lane County will spend up to $250,000 this year publicizing its tight financial picture, in hopes that voters in November will approve higher taxes for public-safety services...

I like this irony approach.... To prove my love to my wife, I find it is very effective to go in the city and pickup hookers to show how unfulfilled and empty sex can be with strange women I don't even know or care for. My wife has to know I love her a great deal by not having any feelings or caring for these skanks, just filthy sluts I use to show I do care for her. Think how heart-broken my wife would be if I didn't have the courage to show my love for her in this way.

I also drink heavily before work, stumbling stupid drunk everyday at work to show my co-workers how important it is not to do as I do, and what a burden I am on the rest of the staff as an pathetic unaccountable alcoholic. I usually drink at lunch, since I take several hours and I need something to fill the time. I think this approach really works, no one in the office spends time drinking with me, they seem to be working extra hard as a result, almost like they are understaffed. When in reality we have a full staff compliment.

Here is a really ridiculous idea... I will spend $400 billion tax-payer public dollars (as part of an economy stimulus effort) on research for salt grass and beetle droppings, these two projects will create 9 research analyst jobs, plus a support staff of 12 more flunkies, it will also provide stipends for a handful of intellectual elitist. At this rate we will save or create .00000001% of the jobs lost last month in the U.S. alone. That is $1.9 billion dollars of tax-payer public funds spent on each job... not bad! With interest that only comes to $2.7 billion for each job over the next ten years. A bargain, even on the Walmart scale of a good deal. These Democrats can really teach us a lot if we would just listen.

Logically, I do not have to give Nancy Pelosi an IQ exam to know she is completely freakin incompetent. She is an F'n idiot just by observation; but the irony approach is to let her continue to spend public funds like a rich teenage coke-whore who is too ugly to screw or prostitute herself for drugs.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, February 12, 2009

Yes...Everything is Better with Bacon

Found this in Vahalla, please sit down before you read, it is pure genius.

First things's first, crisp that bacon in a large saucepan, or dutch oven. When the bacon is sizzling hot, and crisp to your heart's content, remove the bacon from the pan, and add popcorn kernels to the grease. Cover the pot, you wouldn't want your popcorn to bounce everywhere. Appalling though it might seem, this is really no different than adding oil to pan of popcorn kernels. It's just in this case the oil tastes like bacon! Then listen for the pop. There has always been something so exciting, so transformative, about a kettle of kernels turning into a pot of fresh-from-the-stove popcorn.

When the corn is finished popping, season with pepper and a bit of salt, and the crumbled pieces of bacon. Then the only thing left to do, is snack away. The flavor of the corn with the bacon is salty and splendid, the texture is light and crunchy. I definitely had trouble keeping the snacking to a minimum this weekend. But then, who really cares, a little snacking, with a whole lotta bacon, can't be all bad?

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, February 11, 2009

We deserve to sit in our own Feces, we made it!

Please tell me that we elected a Congress and President that is now going to spend an insane amount of money to benefit each other and further fill the pockets of the extremely wealthy... and thankfully provide themselves a "pat yourself on the back" feeling for doing so.

We are all fucking idiots! And deserve this incredible fortunate situation, we earned it, because we suck! Only a country of shit bags who worship unethical Hollywood elitist and unethical liberal socialist politicians and super unethical CEOs deserves the fruit of our votes and fucked up ideology.

Whatcha say we vote our own taxes in so Congress doesn't have to do it for us. I vote for more taxes, let's add a $1.50/gal gas tax, a $.25/min cellular phone use tax, and a $2.75/flush shit tax. Maybe then we can fund this freaking TARP/Stimulus spendathon.

Remember the good ole days when we hated Commies and lawyers. Can't we go back to hating Jane Fonda, the U.N., and the ACLU child molester lobbyist. I still do, join me and Stop the ACLU.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

I'm Freakin Back to Spread Some Cheer

IN CASE YOU ARE WONDERING...? THESE CARTOONS DID NOT COME FROM THE THE NY TIMES DAILY COMMIE TISSUE, OR LOS ANGELES, OR ROCKY MOUNTAIN POST. IT COMES FROM OUR AUSSIE FRIENDS DOWN UNDER.

WHY CAN'T OUR U.S. JOURNALIST AND NEWSPAPERS HAVE THE COURAGE AND INTEGRITY TO SHOW THE TRUTH... FREAKING COWARD WEASELS, BUNCH OF FREEDOM PARASITES HIDING BEHIND AN AMENDMENT OF FREE SPEECH.

I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO FREE HONEST SPEECH, BUT THAT WOULD SHUT DOWN 90% OF THE MEDIA, AT LEAST WE HAVE FOX NEWS.






































*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Well, You Guys Fucked it Up!

At least the few folks at the 1% top will really enjoy the socialist society while the rest of us at the 99% bottom enjoy a new life of poverty.

Thanks, you're all a bunch of fucking idiots.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, October 30, 2008

Obama spin on specifics to confuse voters

WASHINGTON -- Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama was less than upfront in his half-hour commercial Wednesday night about the costs of his programs and the crushing budget pressures he would face in office.

Obama's assertion that "I've offered spending cuts above and beyond" the expense of his promises is accepted only by his partisans. His vow to save money by "eliminating programs that don't work" masks his failure throughout the campaign to specify what those programs are -- beyond the withdrawal of troops from Iraq.

A sampling of what voters heard in the ad, and what he didn't tell them:

THE SPIN: "That's why my health care plan includes improving information technology, requires coverage for preventive care and pre-existing conditions and lowers health care costs for the typical family by $2,500 a year."

THE FACTS: His plan does not lower premiums by $2,500, or any set amount. Obama hopes that by spending $50 billion over five years on electronic medical records and by improving access to proven disease management programs, among other steps, consumers will end up saving money. He uses an optimistic analysis to suggest cost reductions in national health care spending could amount to the equivalent of $2,500 for a family of four. Many economists are skeptical those savings can be achieved, but even if they are, it's not a certainty that every dollar would be passed on to consumers in the form of lower premiums.

THE SPIN: "I also believe every American has a right to affordable health care."

THE FACTS: That belief should not be confused with a guarantee of health coverage for all. He makes no such promise. Obama hinted as much in the ad when he said about the problem of the uninsured: "I want to start doing something about it." He would mandate coverage for children but not adults. His program is aimed at making insurance more affordable by offering the choice of government-subsidized coverage similar to that in a plan for federal employees and other steps, including requiring larger employers to share costs of insuring workers.

THE SPIN: "I've offered spending cuts above and beyond their cost."

THE FACTS: Independent analysts say both Obama and Republican John McCain would deepen the deficit. The nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget estimates Obama's policy proposals would add a net $428 billion to the deficit over four years -- and that analysis accepts the savings he claims from spending cuts. The nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, whose other findings have been quoted approvingly by the Obama campaign, says: "Both John McCain and Barack Obama have proposed tax plans that would substantially increase the national debt over the next 10 years." The analysis goes on to say: "Neither candidate's plan would significantly increase economic growth unless offset by spending cuts or tax increases that the campaigns have not specified."

THE SPIN: "Here's what I'll do. Cut taxes for every working family making less than $200,000 a year. Give businesses a tax credit for every new employee that they hire right here in the U.S. over the next two years and eliminate tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas. Help homeowners who are making a good faith effort to pay their mortgages, by freezing foreclosures for 90 days. And just like after 9-11, we'll provide low-cost loans to help small businesses pay their workers and keep their doors open. "

THE FACTS: His proposals -- the tax cuts, the low-cost loans, the $15 billion a year he promises for alternative energy, and more -- cost money, and the country could be facing a record $1 trillion deficit next year. Indeed, Obama recently acknowledged -- although not in his commercial -- that: "The next president will have to scale back his agenda and some of his proposals."


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Repost, I just love this French stuff...

Sad Day for France

As many are aware, the French government recently announced a raise in its terror alert level from "Run" to "Hide." The normal level is "General Arrogance," and the only two higher levels in France are "Surrender" and "Collaborate." The terror alert rise was precipitated by one of many recent fires that destroyed France's white flag factory; effectively paralyzing the country's military capability.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Subject: Redistribution of Wealth

-------------------------------------------
Today on my way to lunch I passed a homeless guy with a sign that read "Vote
Obama, I need the money." I laughed.

Once in the restaurant my server had on an "Obama 08" tie, again I laughed
as he had given away his political preference--just imagine the coincidence.

When the bill came I decided not to tip the server and explained to him that
I was exploring the Obama redistribution of wealth concept. He stood there
in disbelief while I told him that I was going to redistribute his tip to
someone who I deemed more in need--the homeless guy outside. The server
angrily stormed from my sight.

I went outside, gave the homeless guy $10 and told him to thank the server
inside as I've decided he could use the money more. The homeless guy was
grateful.

At the end of my rather unscientific redistribution experiment I realized
the homeless guy was grateful for the money he did not earn, but the waiter
was pretty angry that I gave away the money he did earn even though the
actual recipient deserved money more.

I guess redistribution of wealth is an easier thing to swallow in concept
than in practical application.


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

... and because some (especially our young) are consumed by your wonderful style and promises for "change" like the Germans who voted for Adolf

To Barack Hussein Obama,

The New York Times carried a story on Saturday, October 4, 2008, that proved you had a significantly closer relationship with Bill Ayers than what you previously admitted. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it.

The Chicago Sun reported on May 8, 2008, that FBI records showed that you had a significantly closer relationship with Tony Rezko than what you previously admitted. In the interview, you said that you only saw Mr. Rezko a couple of times a year. The FBI files showed that you saw him weekly. While the issue of your relationship is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about it.

Your speech in Philadelphia on March 18, 2008, about "race" contradicted your statement to Anderson Cooper on March 14 when you said that you never heard Reverend Wright make his negative statements about white America . While your attendance at Trinity Church for 20 years is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on March 14.

In your 1st debate with John McCain, you said that you never said that you would meet with the leaders of Cuba, Venezuela, Iran, and North Korea without "preparations" at lower levels ... Joe Biden repeated your words in his debate with Sarah Palin ... while the video tape from your debate last February clearly shows that you answered "I would" to the question of meeting with those leaders within 12 months without "any" preconditions. While your judgement about meeting with enemies of the USA without pre-conditions is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America in the debate with McCain.

On July 14, 2008, you said that you always knew that the surge would work while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you stated that the surge would not work. While your judgment about military strategy as a potential commander-in-chief is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America on July 14.

You now claim that your reason for voting against funding for the troops was because the bill did not include a time line for withdrawal, while the video tapes of you from more than a year ago show that you voted against additional funding because you wanted our troops to be removed immediately ... not in 16 months after the 2008 election as you now claim. While your judgment about removing our troops unilaterally in 2007 is of concern, the greater concern is that you lied to America about your previous position.

You claim to have a record of working with Republicans while the record shows that the only bill that you sponsored with a Republican was with Chuck Lugar ... and it failed. The record shows that you vote 97% in concert with the Democrat party and that you have the most liberal voting record in the Senate. You joined Republicans only 13% of the time in your votes and those 13% were only after agreement from the Democrat party. While it is of concern that you fail to include conservatives in your actions and that you are such a liberal, the greater concern is that you distorted the truth.

In the primary debates of last February, 2008, you claimed to have talked with a "Captain" of a platoon in Afghanistan "the other day" when in fact you had a discussion in 2003 with a Lieutenant who had just been deployed to Afghanistan . You lied in that debate.

In your debates last spring, you claimed to have been a "professor of Constitutional law" when in fact you have never been a professor of Constitutional law. In this last debate, you were careful to say that you "taught a law class" and never mentioned being a "professor of Constitutional law." You lied last spring.

You and Joe Biden both claimed that John McCain voted against additional funding for our troops when the actual records show the opposite. You distorted the truth.

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted against funding for alternate energy sources 20 times when the record shows that John McCain specifically voted against funding for bio fuels, especially corn ... and he was right .... corn is too expensive at producing ethanol, and using corn to make ethanol increased the price of corn from $2 a bushel to $6 a bushel for food. You distorted the truth.

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted like both of you for a tax increase on those making as little as $42,000 per year while the voting record clearly shows that John McCain did not vote as you and Joe Biden. You lied to America .

You and Joe Biden claim that John McCain voted with George W. Bush 90% of the time when you know that Democrats also vote 90% of the time with the President (including Joe Biden) because the vast majority of the votes are procedural. You are one of the few who has not voted 90% of the time with the president because you have been missing from the Senate since the day you got elected. While your absence from your job in the Senate is of concern, the greater concern is that you spin the facts.

You did not take an active role in the rescue plan. You claimed that the Senate did not need you while the real reason that you abstained was because of your close relationships with the executives of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Countrywide, and Acorn ... who all helped cause the financial problems of today ... and they all made major contributions to your campaign. While your relationship with these executives and your protection of them for your brief 3 years in the Senate (along with Barney Frank, Chuck Schumer, Maxine Waters, and Chris Dodd) is of concern, the greater concern is that you are being deceitful.

You forgot to mention that you personally represented Tony Rezko and Acorn. Tony Rezko, an Arab and close friend to you, was convicted of fraud in Chicago real estate transactions that bilked millions of tax dollars from the Illinois government for renovation projects that you sponsored as a state senator ... and Acorn has been convicted of voter fraud, real estate sub prime loan intimidation, and illegal campaign contributions. Tony Rezko has contributed hundreds of thousands of dollars to your political campaigns. You personally used your political positions to steer money to both Tony Rezko and Acorn and you used Acorn to register thousands of phony voters for Democrats and you. While your relationships with Rezko and Acorn are of concern, the greater concern is that you omitted important facts about your relationships with them to America .

During your campaign, you said: "typical white person." "They cling to their guns and religion." "They will say that I am black." You played the race card. You tried to label any criticism about you as racist. You divide America .

You claim that you will reduce taxes for 95% of America , but you forgot to tell America that those reductions are after you remove the Bush tax reductions. You have requested close to $1 billion in earmarks and several million for Acorn. Your social programs will cost America $1 trillion per year and you claim that a reduction in military spending ($100 billion for Iraq ) can pay for it. While your economic plan of adding 30% to the size of our federal government is of concern, the greater concern is that you are deceiving America .

The drain to America 's economy by foreign supplied oil is $700 billion per year (5% of GDP) while the war in Iraq is $100 billion (less than 1% of GDP). You voted against any increases to oil exploration for the last 3 years and any expansion of nuclear facilities. Yet today, you say that you have always been for more oil and more nuclear. You are lying to America ...

Mr. Obama, you claimed that you "changed" your mind about public financing for your campaign because of the money spent by Republican PACs in 2004. The truth is that the Democrat PACs in 2004, 2006, and 2008 spent twice as much as the Republican PACs (especially George Soros and MoveOn.org). You are lying to America .

Oh, Mr. Obama, Teddy Roosevelt said about a hundred years ago that we Americans should first look at the character of our leaders before anything else.

Your character looks horrible. While you make good speeches, motivating speeches, your character does not match your rhetoric. You talk the talk, but do not walk the walk.

1. You lied to America . You lied many times. You distorted facts. You parsed your answers like a lawyer.

2. You distorted the record of John McCain in your words and in your advertisements.

3. You had associations with some very bad people for your personal political gains and then lied about those associations.

4. You divide America about race and about class.

Now let me compare your record of lies, distortions, race baiting, and associations to John McCain: War hero. Annapolis graduate with "Country first." Operational leadership experience like all 43 previously elected presidents of the USA as a Navy officer for 22 years. 26 years in the Senate. Straight talk. Maverick. 54% of the time participated on bills with Democrats. Never asked for an earmark. The only blemish on his record is his part in the Keating 5 debacle about 25 years ago.

Mr. Obama, at Harvard Law School, you learned that the end does not justify the means. You learned that perjury, false witness, dishonesty, distortion of truth are never tolerated. Yet, your dishonesty is overwhelming. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty that caused the impeachment and disbarment of Bill Clinton. Your dishonesty is tremendously greater than the dishonesty of Scooter Libby. You should be ashamed.

Mr. Obama, it is time for us Americans to put aside our differences on political issues and vote against you because of your dishonest character. It is time for all of us Americans to put aside our political issues and vote for America first. It is time for America to vote for honesty.

Any people who vote for you after understanding that you are dishonest should be ashamed of themselves for making their personal political issues more important than character. Would these same people vote for the anti-Christ if the anti-Christ promised them riches? Would they make a golden calf while Moses was up the mountain? Would they hire someone for a job if that someone lied in an interview? Of course not. So why do some of these people justify their votes for you even though they know you are dishonest? Why do they excuse your dishonesty? Because some of these people are frightened about the future, the economy, and their financial security .... and you are preying on their fears with empty promises ... and because some (especially our young people) are consumed by your wonderful style and promises for "change" like the Germans who voted for Adolf Hitler in 1932. The greed/envy by Germans in 1932 kept them from recognizing Hitler for who he was. They loved his style. Greed and envy are keeping many Americans from recognizing you ... your style has camouflaged your dishonesty .... but many of us see you for who you really are ... and we will not stop exposing who you are every day, forever if it is necessary.

Mr. Obama, you are dishonest. Anyone who votes for you is enabling dishonesty.

Mr. Obama , America cannot trust that you will put America first in your decisions about the future.

Mr. Obama, you are not the "change" that America deserves. We cannot trust you.

Mr. Obama, You are not ready and not fit to be commander-in-chief.

Mr. Obama, John McCain does not have as much money as your campaign to refute all of your false statements. And for whatever reasons, the mainstream media will not give adequate coverage or research about your lies, distortions, word parsing, bad associations, race baiting, lack of operational leadership experience, and generally dishonest character. The media is diverting our attention from your relationships and ignoring the fact that you lied about those relationships. The fact that you lied is much more important than the relationships themselves .... just like with Bill Clinton and Richard Nixon ... Monica Lewinski and Watergate were not nearly as bad as the fact that those men lied about the events ..... false witness ... perjury ... your relationships and bad judgments are bad on their own .... but your lies are even worse.

Therefore, by copy of this memo, all who read this memo are asked to send it to everyone else in America before it is too late. We need to do the job that the media will not do. We need to expose your dishonesty so that every person in America understands who you really are before election day.

Mr. Obama, in a democracy, we get what we deserve. And God help America if we deserve you.

Michael Master
McLean, Virginia

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Associated Press (AP) released a story titled: Secret U.S. Mission hauls uranium from Iraq

Subject: Shocking New Revelation

This is new information everyone should know. You will find verification links at the end of this shocking article.

This has been flying under the radar. Read the MSNBC article and check the truthorfiction.Com site. The TorF version is shown below. This event is factual. I have an increased respect for President Bush. He has taken the heat of being called a liar and a war monger for 5 years while he kept his silence to protect the people of the world. This is truly a display of selfless honor.

On July 5, 2008, the Associated Press (AP) released a story titled: Secret U.S. Mission hauls uranium from Iraq.

The opening paragraph is as follows:

The last major remnant of Saddam Hussein's nuclear program a huge stockpile of concentrated natural uranium reached a Canadian port Saturday to complete a secret U.S. Operation that included a two week airlift from Baghdad and a ship voyage crossing two oceans.

See anything wrong with this picture? We have been hearing from the far-left for more than five years how, Bush lied. Somehow, that slogan loses its credibility now that 550 metric tons of Saddam's yellowcake, used for nuclear weapon enrichment, has been discovered and shipped to Canada for its new use as nuclear energy.

It appears that American troops found the 550 metric tons of uranium in 2003 after invading Iraq . They had to sit on this information and the uranium itself, for fear of terrorists attempting to steal it. It was guarded and kept safe by our military in a 23,000-acre site with large sand beams surrounding the site.

This is vindication for the Bush administration, having been attacked mercilessly by the liberal media and the far-left pundits on the blogosphere. Now that it is proven that President Bush did not lie about Saddam's nuclear ambitions, one would think the mainstream media would report the story. Once the AP released t he story, the mainstream media should have picked it up and broadcast it worldwide.

This never happened, due in large part I believe, to the fact that the mainstream media would have to admit they were wrong about Bush's war motives all along. Thankfully, the AP got it right when it said, The removal of 550 metric tons of yellowcake the seed material for higher-grade nuclear enrichment was a significant step toward closing the books on Saddam's nuclear legacy.

Closing the book on Saddam's nuclear legacy. Did Saddam have a nuclear legacy after all? I thought Bush lied. As it turns out, the people who lied were Joe Wilson and his wife.

Valerie Plame engaged in a clear case of nepotism and convinced the CIA to send her husband on a fact finding mission in February 2002, seeking to determine if Saddam Hussein attempted to buy yellowcake from Niger . The CIA and British intelligence believed Saddam contacted Niger for that purpose but needed proof.

During his trip to Niger , Wilson actually interviewed the former prime minister of Niger , Ibrahim Assane Mayaki. Mayaki told Wilson that in June of 1999, an Iraqi delegation expressed interest in 'expanding commercial relations' for the purposes of purchasing yellowcake.

Wilson chose to overlook Mayaki's remarks and reported to the CIA that there was no evidence of Hussein wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger .

However, with British intelligence insisting the claim was true, President Bush used that same claim in his State of the Union address in January of 2003.

Outraged by Bush's insistence that the claim was true, Wilson wrote an op-Ed in the New York Times in the summer of 2003 slamming Bush.

Wilson did this in spite of the fact that Mayaki said Saddam did try to buy the yellowcake from Niger . The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence disagreed with Wilson and supported Mayaki's claim. This meant nothing to Wilson who was opposed to the Iraq war and thus had ulterior motives in covering up the prime minister's statements.

It was a simple tactic really. If the far-left and their friends in the media could prove Bush lied about Hussein wanting to purchase yellowcake from Niger , it would undermine President Bush's credibility and give them more cause for asking what other lies he may have told.

Yet, the real lie came from Wilson, who interpreted his own meaning from the prime minister's statements and concluded all by himself that the claim of Saddam attempting to purchase yellowcake was 'unequivocally wrong.' Curiously, the CIA sat on this information and did not inform the CIA Director, who sided with Bush on the yellowcake claim. This was made public in a bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee report in July 2004.

Valerie Plame also engaged in her own lie campaign by spreading the notion that the Bush administration outed her as a CIA agent. Never mind that it was Richard Armitage -- no friend of the Bush administration -- who leaked Plame's identity to the press. Never mind that Plame had not been in the field as a CIA agent in some six years.

The truth is, due to their opposition to the war, Joe Wilson, Valerie Plame, the mainstream media and their left-wing friends on the blogosphere engaged in a propaganda campaign to undermine the Bush administration. Now that Saddam's uranium has been made public and is no longer a threat to the world, do you think these aforementioned parties will apologize and admit they were wrong? Don't count on it. The rest of the American people should hear the truth about Saddam's uranium. It is up to you and me to inform them every chance we get.

As far as the anti-war crowd is concerned, the next time they say that, 'Bush lied,' we should tell them to, 'Have the yellowcake and eat it too.'

This story was verified, if you want to check it for yourself, click on the links below.
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/u/uraniumyellowcake.htm
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/25546334




*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

A nation can survive its fools...The traitor is the plague.

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear. The traitor is the plague.

--Marcus Tullius Cicero, in a speech to the Roman Senate, 42 BC


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, October 27, 2008

North American Man/Boy Love Association (NAMBLA) Endorses Obama

NAMBLA rapes little boys... 
ACLU supports and defends NAMBLA... 
Obama supports the ACLU agenda... 
ACLU vigorously defends these perverted child molesters so they can continue to rape children... 
thus Obama's Senate voting records leads to children being raped. 

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Maybe this will help explain "redistribution of wealth"

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.

The fifth would pay $1.

The sixth would pay $3.

The seventh would pay $7.

The eighth would pay $12.

The ninth would pay $18.

The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.

So, that's what they decided to do. The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve.

'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20.

Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?' They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each MAN'S bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.!


And so:

The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing(100% savings).
The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings).
The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings).
The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).
The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).
The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).

Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings.

'I only got a dollar out of the $20, 'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!'

Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten Times more than I!'

'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they might start drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.


David R. Kamerschen, Ph.D.
Professor of Economics, University of Georgia


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

NEVER FIND OUT - BARACK OBAMA'S LIES

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Sunday, October 19, 2008

Hugo Chavez endorses Obama

Could it be that Chavez is shit scared of this man? That's the best propaganda McCain can get. And, it's free! Chavez knows that among all the candidates, McCain is the one who is not gonna take any shit from him. Maybe even less than Bush.

I personally read this news as a very clever endorsement for Obama, not Clinton. I tell you why, Castro and Ortega already have supported Obama. Both Obama and Chavez have the same racial and social manipulation towards minorities. They both presented themselves as the minority candidate who will save the poor of the Universe. Not that Clinton is not in the same boat, but seems to me that Obama is the commies fav. candidate. So, Chavez has more in common with Obama -the emptyness of their message?- than Clinton's. In addition, The Kennedy clan, Jessy Jackson and others who are open sympathizer -and leeches- of Chavez, the majority of these radical left airheads are already for Obama.

Having said that, Chavez is very discredited among the moderate faction of the demos which is the majority, so probably he was advised to say it on an indirect way, that he is against McCain, so he won't scare demo voters off from Obama.

Now Obama only needs the official Bin Laden's and Ahmadinejad's endorsement to be the fav. candidate of the terrorist.

Posted by FeathersMcGraw at 1:49 PM



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Barack Obama, Hugo Chavez, and Code Pink Funding

APRIL 15, 2008

Melanie Morgan, writing in her weekly column at WorldNetDaily, and Catherine Moy in a special report for Human Events Online, highlight new FEC reports that reveal one of Barack Obama's campaign fundraisers (specifically a bundler) is an active supporter of Venezuelan dictator Hugo Chavez and Islamic militants. (Joe Wierzbicki, via email)
Code Pink Funds Barack Obama, AND has connections to Hugo Chavez, from Human Events

Jodie Evans, co-founder of the radical anti-war group Code Pink has “bundled” more than $50,000 for Sen. Barack Obama’s presidential campaign, and pro-troops groups are demanding that he return the money. Evans and her son, a student who lives at her Southern California address, each also gave the maximum individual allowable donation of $2,300 to Obama’s campaign. [snip]
Evans sat on the board of directors of the Rain Forest Action Network (RAN), a coalition of capitalist-hating environmentalist groups. The co-founder of RAN also founded the violent and radical Animal Liberation Front, which the FBI listed as one of the largest domestic terrorism threats in the United States.

The FBI reported that RAN and the Earth Liberation Front committed more than 600 criminal acts and racked up $43 million in damages over seven years.

Melanie Morgan has more on "Barack's terrorist-sympathizing fundraiser"

And again, we were reminded that the man who adored Rev. Jeremiah Wright – he of the "God damn America" school of uniting – is the same man who today calls for the surrender of U.S. troops to the forces of Islamic jihadists. [snip]
Someone who hasn't been absent from the pews of the church of Obama-mania is a woman named Jodie Evans, who happens to work for the anti-American group Code Pink.

Code Pink has been in the headlines recently for their campaign of "counter-recruitment" where military recruiting centers here in the United States have been violently attacked by "peace" thugs.

Code Pink's treasonous behavior on foreign soil has been equally disgusting.

The organization traveled to Iraq to give $600,000 in aid to what they called "the other side" so they could resist Coalition Forces. The "other side" is a euphemism for Islamic terrorists. But remember, according to the worldview of Barack Hussein Obama, these terrorists have nothing to do with the jihad that's been declared against America.

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Home » AIM Column » Obama’s Red Mentor Was a Pervert

This does not mean he is a molester himself, or does it?

Obama’s Red Mentor Was a Pervert

AIM COLUMN | BY CLIFF KINCAID | AUGUST 24, 2008

Clearly, this is liberal pro-Obama media bias by omission.

Covering a sensitive and explosive subject that has been off-limits for the major U.S. media, the London Daily Telegraph is now claiming that Communist Frank Marshall Davis was a strong influence over a young Barack Obama for nine years of his life, rather than just four, and was a sex pervert and pothead. The Telegraph article alleges that Davis was a bisexual engaged in “sordid” sexual activities and had repeated sexual encounters with a 13-year-old girl.

In an article headlined, “Frank Marshall Davis, alleged Communist, was early influence on Barack Obama,” writer Toby Harnden confirms everything Accuracy in Media has been reporting since February about the mysterious “Frank” in Obama’s book being Communist Party USA (CPUSA) member Frank Marshall Davis. Harnden is the Daily Telegraph’s U.S. Editor, based in Washington, D.C.

The word “alleged” in the headline is misleading, since there is no doubt that Davis, who was investigated by the FBI and various congressional and official inquiries, was a CPUSA member. In fact, as AIM has documented, Davis was involved in the CPUSA or its front activities, before, during and after World War II, and became a member of a secret communist apparatus in the 1950s after the CPUSA in Hawaii was reorganized on an underground basis. Davis died in 1987.

“Although identified only as Frank in Mr. Obama’s memoir Dreams from My Father, it has now been established that he was Frank Marshall Davis, a radical activist and journalist who had been suspected of being a member of the Communist Party in the 1950s,” Harnden reported.

Davis wasn’t just a “suspected” communist but a key CPUSA member involved in an important Soviet-sponsored network. The communists had targeted Hawaii largely because of its strategic location and importance to the U.S. defense effort. The CPUSA, which was controlled by the Soviet Communist Party, was receiving funding from the Soviet Communist Party through KGB channels as late as the 1980s.

Lies from the Washington Post

But while the London paper is reporting explosive new information about Davis and his relationship with Obama, the Washington Post on Sunday, August 24, published a 10,000-word article, supposedly on Obama’s years in Hawaii, and never once mentioned Davis. Even though the Post advertised the article as being about Obama’s “formative years” in Hawaii, the lengthy piece by David Maraniss, an associate editor at the paper and Pulitzer Prize-winner, completely ignores the fact that Davis was Obama’s mentor and adviser for a significant number of those years.

This is so despite the fact that Maraniss claims in the article and a video to be familiar with the contents of Obama’s book, Dreams From My Father, where the mysterious “Frank” makes numerous appearances and gives Obama advice on matters ranging from race relations to college and his life in the U.S.

Asked about this striking omission in his Post article, Maraniss told AIM that “My reporting conclusion was the role of ‘Frank’ had been hyped out of all proportion, both by Obama himself in his book and some others later. He did not play a role in really shaping Obama.”

This “conclusion,” of course, fails to let the readers decide, based on what Obama and others have reported. And he does not explain how he came to this conclusion.

Clearly, this is liberal pro-Obama media bias by omission. It is designed to keep the public in the dark about the role of a CPUSA member in shaping Obama’s worldview. Such a cover-up is necessary to get Obama elected.

Indeed, the Post Maraniss article is deception on a greater scale than a recent Associated Press article, which examined Davis’s role as Obama’s mentor and adviser but ignored his CPUSA activities.

As we all know by now, “Frank” was initially “established” to be Frank Marshall Davis by Gerald Horne, a writer for a CPUSA publication, who boasted about the relationship that Davis had with Obama. Horne’s remarks were brought to our attention by New Zealand blogger Trevor Loudon. Former associates of Davis in Hawaii confirmed his identification.

The Relationship Begins

Based on these sources, AIM had confirmed that Obama’s white grandfather, Stanley Dunham, picked Davis because Obama’s black father had abandoned the family and Dunham thought Obama needed a black father-figure. AIM also confirmed that Davis was Obama’s mentor during the critical years 1975-1979.

Harnden claimed in a preceding article that Obama was introduced to Davis in 1970 when he was only nine years old. This would mean that Davis was an influence over Obama for about nine full years, until Obama was 18 and went off to college.

Harnden quotes Dawna Weatherly-Williams, a friend of Davis’s, as saying that Stanley Dunham brought Obama to meet Davis in the autumn of 1970. She “was chatting with him [Davis] that late autumn afternoon as Dunham and Barry [Obama] approached,” Harnden reports.

Some accounts say that Obama returned to Hawaii in 1971. But Harnden tells me that the Punahou School, the coeducational college preparatory day school in Honolulu that Obama attended from 1971 to 1979, was adamant that Obama took his entrance examine in autumn 1970. “It’s possible he briefly went back to Indonesia before actually starting at the school,” he said.

But whether it was 1970 or 1971, this adds several years to the amount of time that Davis was exercising influence over Obama. This is enough time to have made it into a Washington Post 10,000-word account of Obama’s years in Hawaii. But Maraniss deliberately decided to ignore it.

Harnden also reports that Davis and Dunham smoked marijuana together. Dawna Weatherly-Williams said that “Frank never really did drugs, though he and Stan would smoke pot together,” the paper said.

Obama, of course, also admits that he used marijuana and cocaine in his youth.

Citing passages from Obama’s own book, Dreams From My Father, which was published in 1995, Harnden demonstrates how Obama went to “Frank” for advice about racial issues, college, and other matters at critical periods in his life. Clearly, the relationship between them, as concluded by many observers, was strong. But Maraniss of the Post decided to deliberately ignore it.

This may have something to do with the fact that the Post chairman, the late Katharine Graham, began her career as a journalist for the San Francisco News using labor leader Harry Bridges, a CPUSA member and Frank Marshall Davis associate, as a news “source.” This fact is acknowledged in an obituary of Graham on the official Post website. The Post Company and the paper today are run by members of the Graham family.

While Obama cites the radical advice that Davis gave him, he gave no hint that “Frank” was ever a communist. But the evidence shows that Davis was not only an identified member of the Communist Party USA but that his associate, Bridges, the labor leader in Hawaii, was elevated to the CPUSA central committee only with the approval of Moscow itself.

The Network

Herbert Romerstein, a former government investigator of communist activities, has documented how Davis was one of the party cadre sent to Hawaii from Chicago to organize the party there. Davis went to Hawaii after consulting with Paul Robeson, a secret CPUSA member, and Bridges, who ran the International Longshore and Warehouse Union. This labor union subsidized the newspaper, the Honolulu Record, which Davis wrote for.

Romerstein visited the archives of the Communist International, known as the Comintern, and discovered a report on Bridges, establishing him to be a member of the central committee of the CPUSA with a great future in the party. Moscow had to approve Bridges’ high-level status in the party.

Romerstein explains, “Bridges, of course, always denied party membership and attempts were made to deport him because he was a communist. He was born in Australia, but he was able to fight back because he had very, very sharp shyster lawyers and a lot of friends in the U.S. Government that helped him and they prevented his deportation. But he had been a major force promoting communism.”

We also know that, as late as the early 1970s, after he had met Obama, Davis was still associating with a CPUSA front called the American Committee for Foreign Born, which existed to prevent the deportation from the U.S. of foreign communists such as Bridges. Davis had met Bridges at the Abraham Lincoln School in Chicago, a CPUSA front.

A 1973 mailing from the American Committee for Foreign Born listed Davis as a sponsor, in addition to Harriet Bouslog, the CPUSA member and Hawaii lawyer who was his counsel during Davis’s appearance in 1956 before the Senate Internal Security Subcommittee. In that appearance, Davis refused to deny he was a CPUSA member.

Sexual Perversion and Rape

Davis’s alleged sexual perversion adds a dramatic and alarming element to the controversy. Harnden reports that Davis’s sexual proclivities were documented in a 1968 pornographic novel, written just two years before Davis became Obama’s mentor, which was titled, Sex Rebel: Black (Memoirs of a Gourmet Gash). Davis wrote the book, which is now generally unavailable, under a pseudonym, Bob Greene.

Harnden flatly asserts that “The book, which closely tracks Mr. Davis’s life in Chicago and Hawaii and the fact that his first wife was black and his second white, describes in lurid detail a series of shockingly sordid sexual encounters, often involving group sex. One chapter concerns the seduction by Mr. Davis and his first wife of a 13-year-old girl called Anne. Mr. Davis wrote that it was the girl who had suggested he had sex with her.”

Harnden added, “He then described how he and his wife would have sex with the girl” many times over the course of several weeks. “On other occasions,” he added, “Mr. Davis would cruise in Hawaii parks looking for couples or female tourists to have sex with. He derived sexual gratification from bondage, simulated rape and being flogged and urinated on.”

This explosive information, if the character in the book is actually based on Davis’s own experiences, would further demonstrate why Obama would want to cover up Davis’s true identity in his book, calling him just “Frank.”

There is no question that Davis wrote the book under the pseudonym of “Bob Greene.” John Edgar Tidwell, the editor of other books by Davis, has confirmed this is the case. But Tidwell has questioned how much of Sex Rebel is based on Davis’s own life experiences and describes it as “semi-autobiographical.”

Harnden acknowledged to AIM that Davis “left himself some wiggle room, not least I suppose because of the possibility of prosecution” for statutory rape of a 13-year-old.

But in the introduction to Livin’ the Blues, a book by Davis that Tidwell edited, Tidwell reveals that Davis left behind after his death an uncompleted manuscript, “The Incredible Waikiki Jungle,” which describes how Davis “specialized in sex” during the period 1969-1976. No details are provided by Tidwell. He also says that Davis wrote another unpublished manuscript called “Mixed Sex Salad.”

Whether the book Sex Rebel is entirely based on Davis or not, the controversy certainly demonstrates that Davis had a perverted sexual interest and should not have been trusted as a mentor for any young person.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell

Obama has not publicly responded to growing concern about his relationship with Davis, and whether Davis’s influence went beyond ideology to matters of a sexual nature. However, during a campaign appearance on Thursday, Obama accused Jerome Corsi, author of The Obama Nation, of “making stuff up” about him. Corsi devotes part of chapter 3 of his book to Davis’s role as a “Communist mentor” for Obama.

But the Obama campaign’s 40-page so-called rebuttal to Corsi’s book confirms and does not deny the Obama relationship with Davis. The rebuttal, however, doesn’t acknowledge that Davis was a communist and instead tries to depict him as a civil rights activist by dishonestly editing an article about Davis. It makes no mention of Davis’s Sex Rebel book and his interest in pornography.

With the allegations about Davis’s life as a sex pervert and consumer of illegal drugs, the pressure could mount on Obama to come clean about the mysterious relationship.

But the pressure may not be coming from the “conservative” Fox News Channel.

On August 18, Fox News aired a special program, “Presidential Character & Conduct 2008: Barack Obama,” which not only ignored Frank Marshall Davis but the association of Obama with Communist terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn. The program, narrated by Bill Hemmer, a former anchor for CNN, mostly relied on friends, associates and a friendly biographer of Obama for information about the candidate.

While the program did include information about Obama’s relationship with convicted felon Tony Rezko, it concluded that Obama did nothing illegal and ignored Rezko’s involvement with a controversial Iraqi-born billionaire, Nadhmi Auchi, who has been pressuring the media to stop running negative stories about him.

One has to wonder if Auchi or his representatives got to Fox News Channel, whose parent company, News Corporation, is run by Rupert Murdoch, a vocal supporter of Obama, and is owned in part by an Arab-based Middle Eastern company.

Cliff Kincaid is the Editor of the AIM Report and can be reached at cliff.kincaid@aim.org


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Obama ~ Sadly is a Racist

Just FYI, this stuff was written by Obama himself! Kinda gives you an insight to the dude that thinks he's going to be our President.

From Dreams of My Father: 'I ceased to advertise my mother's race at the age of 12 or 13, when I began to suspect that by doing so I was ingratiating myself to whites.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'I found a solace in nursing a pervasive sense of grievance and animosity against my mother's race.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'There was something about him that made me wary, a little too sure of himself, maybe. And white.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'It remained necessary to prove which side you were on, to show your loyalty to the black masses, to strike out and name names.'

From Dreams of My Father: 'I never emulate white men and brown men whose fates didn't speak to my own. It was into my father's image, the black man, son of Africa , that I'd packed all the attributes I sought in myself , the attributes of Martin and Malcolm, DuBois and Mandela.'

And FINALLY the Most Damning one of ALL of them!!!
From Audacity of Hope: 'I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.'


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Saturday, October 18, 2008

Obama promising ACORN

OBAMA CAUGHT ON TAPE!

See the shocking short video that shows Obama promising ACORN and other far-left community organizaers that they'll have a seat at the table and help shape the agenda during his presidential administration.

Barack Hussein Obama is still trying to downplay his connection to ACORN but the camera doesn't lie! In fact, this short video may suggest that his associations with ACORN, Rev. Jeremiah Wright, Father Pflueger, Bill Ayers and even Louis Farrakhan may just be the tip of the iceberg!

Watch The Video

*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Saturday, October 11, 2008

Any Child Lascivious Union (ACLU) Obama Score is 82%

ACLU Congressional Scorecard

Senator Barack Obama, (Democrat, Illinois)  Lifetime score: 82% 

... 82%, therefore 4 of 5 children victims of child rape and molestation are further victimized by the ACLU members favorite legislator.  His policies and voting record help the ACLU fight for the child rapist so they can be free to victimize and rape more children. 

Fortunately, Louis Farrakhan's Messiah "Obama" does allow the 5th child overlooked by his 4-of-5 child rape - ACLU friendly policies to be aborted as a living creation of God only to be left in a trash receptacle or soiled laundry hamper until dead.  

At least Obama's abortion policies allows a precious child born alive to die alone, suffering but just for an hour or so, in the trash rather than being haunted by a lifetime of mental anguish by being the victim of child rape by a typical ACLU benefactor.  Thanks for looking out for our children Obama, your a great leader. 


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, October 09, 2008

Who's Voting for Who

Barack “Barry” Hussein Obama Supporters 

Hugo Chavez (terrorist supporter) 

The Castro brothers, Fidel & Ru’al (terrorist supporter)

Mahmoud Ahmadinejad (terrorist)

Kim Jong-il (terrorist supporter)

Rosie O'Donnell (wtf?) 

Osama bin Laden (terrorist) 

Jane Fonda (traitor) 

Joe Stalin (absentee ballot) 

ACLU (support child molesters, Christ haters) 

Louis Farrakhan (idiot) 

Reverend Jeremiah Wright (another idiot) 

NAMBLA (child molester organization) 

Various Child Rapist & Molesters 

Various Hollywood Skanks 

Mosquitoes (unrivaled pest) 

Fonda Savants 

Hannity & Combs


John McCain & Sarah Palin Supporters

John “The Duke” Wayne (absentee ballot)

Ronald Reagan (absentee ballot)

Abraham Lincoln (absentee ballot)

Newt Gingrich (great historian)

Bob Dole (great American)

Colin Powell (great American)

Condoleezza Rice (genius)

Dwight Eisenhower (absentee ballot)

Charlton Heston (absentee ballot)

Cub Scouts of America (loyal Americans)

Ben Stein (great author, speaker)

Guinness Drinkers (geniuses)

Bacon Lovers (yummies)

Superman

“Dogs” Man’s Best Friend

Bill O’Reilly

Theodore Roosevelt (absentee ballot)

Hannity & Combs


*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Monday, October 06, 2008

Obama; has he always been funded by terrorist, or is it a freaky coincidence..? like O.J.

Obama's life.

Around 1979 Obama started college at Occidental in California. He is very open about his two years at Occidental, he tried all kinds of drugs and was wasting his time but, even though he had a brilliant mind, did not apply himself to his studies. "Barry" (that was the name he used all his life) during this time had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan.

During the summer of 1981, after his second year in college, he made a "round the world" trip. Stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, next Hyderabad in India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan where he stayed with his roommate's family, then off to Africa to visit his father's family. My question - Where did he get the money for this trip? When he came back he started school at Columbia University in New York.

It is at this time he wants everyone to call him Barack - not Barry. Do you know what the tuition is at Columbia? It's not cheap! to say the least. Where did he get money for tuition? Student Loans? Maybe. After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a Community Organizer for $12,000 a year. Why Chicago? Why not New York? He was already living in New York.

By "chance" he met Antoin "Tony" Rezko, born in Aleppo Syria, and a real estate developer in Chicago. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery this year. Rezko, was named "Entrepreneur of the Decade" by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association". About two years later, Obama entered Harvard Law School. Do you have any idea what tuition is for Harvard Law School? Where did he get the money for Law School? More student loans?

After Law school, he went back to Chicago. Rezko offered him a job, which he turned down. But, he did take a job with Davis, Miner, Barnhill & Galland. Guess what? They represented "Rezar" which Rezko's firm. Rezko was one of Obama's first major financial contributors when he ran for office in Chicago. In 2003, Rezko threw an early fundraiser for Obama which Chicago Tribune reporter David Mendelland claims was instrumental in providing Obama with "seed money" for his U.S. Senate race.

In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in Kenwoood District of Chicago for $1.65 million (less than asking price). With ALL those Student Loans - Where did he get the money for the property? On the same day Rezko's wife, Rita, purchased the adjoining empty lot for full price. The London Times reported that Nadhmi Auc hi, an Iraqi-born Billionaire loaned Rezko $3.5 million three weeks before Obama's new home was purchased. Obama met Nadhmi Auchi many times with Rezko.

Now, we have Obama running for President. Valerie Jarrett, was Michele Obama's boss. She is now Obama's chief advisor and he does not make any major decisions without talking to her first. Where was Jarrett born? Ready for this? Shiraz, Iran! Do we see a pattern here? Or am I going crazy?

On May 10, 2008 The Times reported, Robert Malley advisor to Obama was "sacked" after the press found out he was having regular contacts with "Hamas", which controls Gaza and is connected with Iran. This past week, buried in the back part of the papers, Iraqi newspapers reported that during Obama's visit to Iraq, he asked their leaders to do nothing about the war until after he is elected, and he will "Take care of things".

Oh, and by the way, remember the college roommates that where born in Pakistan? They are in charge of all those "small" Internet campaign contribution for Obama. Where is that money coming from? The poor and middle class in this country? Or could it be from the Middle East?

And the final bit of news. On September 7, 2008, The Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on "This Week" with George Stephanapoulos. Obama on talking about his religion said, "My Muslim faith". When questioned, "he made a mistake". Some mistake!

All of the above information I got on line. If you would like to check it - Wikipedia, encyclopedia, Barack Obama; Tony Rezko; Valerie Jarrett: Daily Times – Obama visited Pakistan in 1981; The Washington Times - September 7, 2008; The Times May 10, 2008.

Now the BIG question - If I found out all this information on my own, Why haven't all of our "intelligent" members of the press been reporting this?



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Friday, October 03, 2008

History Repeats Itself, and the Liberal Media Sucks

General VoNguyen Giap.
General Giap was a brilliant, highly respected leader
of the North Vietnam military. The following quote
is from his memoirs currently found in the
Vietnam war memorial in Hanoi :
'What we still don't understand is why you Americans
stopped the bombing of Hanoi . You had us on the
ropes. If you had pressed us a little harder,
just for another day or two, we were ready
to surrender! It was the same at the
battles of TET. You defeated us!
We knew it, and we thought
you knew it.
But we were elated to notice your media was definitely
helping us. They were causing more disruption in
America than we could in the battlefields. We
were ready to surrender. You had won!'
General Giap has published his memoirs and confirmed
what most Americans knew. The Vietnam war was not
lost in Vietnam -- it was lost at home.. The exact
same slippery slope, sponsored by the US media,
is currently well underway. It exposes the
enormous power of a Biased Media to
cut out the heart and will of
the American public.
A truism worthy of note: ... Do not fear the enemy, for
they can take only your life. Fear the media far more, for
they will destroy your honor.



*Disclaimer: Items presented here, on this site, are intended to inspire thought. Opinions and discussions presented here are derived from internal dialogue as well as a variety of national and international sources including magazines, books, the Internet, TV, radio and newspapers. Nothing on this site is represented as being proven in fact, but provided as opinion and discussion points which echo only one obvious real conclusion -- the ACLU and the French suck.

Thursday, October 02, 2008

Skank Fonda Political Contributions 1979-2008

Skank Fonda contributes to... You Guessed It - MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, BARACKOBAMA, NANCY PELOSI, AND MANY ABORTION RIGHTS FOUNDATIONS.

Jane Fonda , 70 (bio)
actress

NEWSMEAT Power Rank: 1,673

Election Picks: 19 wins, 29 losses

$127,046 Democrat
$74,250 special interest
total: $201,296
Contributor Candidate or PAC Election
Result*
Amount Date FEC
Filing
Fonda, Jane
Atlanta , GA 30303
Fonda Inc/Actor
Hillary Clinton (D)
President
HILLARY CLINTON FOR PRESIDENT
- $2,300
primary
07/14/08
Fonda, Jane S.
Atlanta , GA 30303
Self-Employed/Actor
John Lewis (D)
House (GA District: 05)
JOHN LEWIS FOR CONGRESS
- $250
primary
05/27/08
Fonda, Jane S
Atlanta , GA 30303
Barack Obama (D)
President
OBAMA FOR AMERICA
- $2,300
primary
03/18/08
FONDA, JANE S
ATLANTA, GA 31107
SELF/ACTRESS
Jack Carter (D)
Senate - NV
CARTER FOR SENATE COMMITTEE
Lost$2,100
general
09/30/06
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 30303
SELF EMPLOYED/ACTRESS
IRAQ VETERANS FOR PROGRESS - $2,500
primary
07/20/06
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 31107
ENTERTAINER
Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)
Senate - NY
FRIENDS OF HILLARY
Won$2,000
primary
03/31/05
Fonda, Jane
Atlanta, GA 31107
Fonda Inc./Actress Activist Philant
MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION - $2,000
primary
09/23/04
Fonda, Jane S
Atlanta, GA 31107
Fonda Inc./Actress Activist Philant
MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION - $2,000
primary
08/10/04
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 31107
ACTRESS
Barbara Boxer (D)
Senate - CA
FRIENDS OF BARBARA BOXER
Won$1,000
general
07/14/04
Fonda, Jane Ms
Atlanta, GA 31107
Seymour 1999 Trust
Nadine Thomas (D)
House (GA District: 04)
COMMITTEE TO ELECT NADINE THOMAS
Lost$1,000
primary
06/04/04
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 31107
FONDA INC
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (D) - $1,000
primary
04/27/04
Fonda, Jane S.
Atlanta, GA 30303
Self/Actress
Cathy Woolard (D)
House (GA District: 04)
FRIENDS OF CATHY WOOLARD, INC
Lost$2,000
primary
04/14/04
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA , GA 30303
ACTRESS/ACTIVIST/PHILANTROPIST
MOVEON.ORG VOTER FUND - $300
primary
11/12/03
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 31107
ACTRESS
Tom Daschle (D)
Senate - SD
NEW LEADERSHIP FOR AMERICA PAC
Lost$500
primary
09/27/03
Fonda, Jane
Atlanta, GA 30303
Self-Employed/Entertainer
DEMOCRATIC CONGRESSIONAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (D) - $1,000
primary
06/30/03
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 31107
ACTRESS
DEMOCRATIC SENATORIAL CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE (D) - $1,000
primary
10/23/02
Fonda, Jane
Atlanta, GA 31107
Self Employed/Actress
DEDICATED AMERICANS FOR THE SENATE AND HOUSE PAC - $5,000
primary
06/21/02
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 30303
RETIRED
Maria Cantwell (D)
Senate - WA
FRIENDS OF MARIA
Won$1,000
general
04/08/02
FONDA, JANE
ATLANTA, GA 30303
RETIRED
Maria Cantwell (D)
Senate - WA
FRIENDS OF MARIA
Won$1,000
primary
04/08/02
FONDA, JANE S
ATLANTA, GA 31107
Erskine Bowles (D)
Senate - NC
ERSKINE BOWLES FOR US SENATE
- $-500
primary
03/29/02
FONDA, JANE